..with transcript below
..
Oct 2, 2025
TRANSCRIPT
be wary.
Just to elaborate on that really quick.
So what Mark meant I guess when he
brought up like Lifeloglog and Facebook.
So like Lifelog and these other programs
which also brought us Palanteer, another
Peter Teal PayPal mafia company. They
tried to make this insane ponopticon
program after 9/11 called total
information awareness. Look up the logo.
It's very illuminating. And basically
the goal they put like an Iran Contra
criminal in charge of it who was
obsessed with like mass surveillance for
the purpose of pre-rime and arresting
people for like potentially threatening
the existing status quo of the
government and like protesting war
nonviolently and stuff in charge of this
DARPA public private partnership called
total information awareness that was
going to suck up everyone's data and
predictively you know just enable a
pre-rime type of surveillance drag net.
very unconstitutional stuff. And I think
the the the national security state
realized then because there was a huge
uproar about it that people were not
willing to accept that if the government
was overtly involved, but they would if
it appeared at least as a purely private
sector venture. So the same I think is
true for CBDC's. They've seen this push
back. People don't want CBDC's no to
central bank control. Well, they don't
want the government issuing the CBDC and
the government programming and
surveilling the money. So, I think
they're going to do what they did with
total information awareness. Use private
entities like, you know, JP Morgan, the
same banks that everyone, you know, most
people use now, and have them be the
issuers of the de facto CBDC, or rather
the synthetic CBDC is the term that gets
thrown around some as well. Synthetic
CBDC's, you know, as defined by the
people that use that term is something
like a stable coin with a twist, which
means that the reserves are backed up by
the Fed or backed up with the Fed. And
it's going to get even worse the terms
of like the blending of these of these
groups because that same Carnegie
endowment thing that I mentioned with
like all the big US banks, the Fed, the
ECB, the Bank of England and like tech
companies and stuff, their solution to
cyber attack problems or a coming cyber
pandemic was to basically merge banks,
banking regulators and intelligence
agencies. you know, if and when this big
cyber attack that they're predictively
programming happens, the enemy is going
to be privacy. They're going to be like,
"We can't have privacy anymore." That's
what they're going to say. I guarantee
that because that's the only way they
can, you know, basically force adoption
of all this stuff they want to do, which
is CBDC's digital ID is they want
everything you do online to be
completely surveillable, and that
includes financial transactions, like
specifically financial transactions. And
so people for a long time have rightly
pointed out that digital IDs and CBDC's
are like, you know, they go together,
right? You get you get both. It's not
just like one or the other. Like it's a
very like integrated thing. You know,
this is all also tied up with this uh
goal to have the driver's license for
the internet that you have to have, you
know, your digital ID or government
issued ID tied to everything you do
online. Whatever happens with this
thing, they're going to blame whoever
they want really because we know with
like Wikileaks Vault 7, right? The CIA
through the Umbbridge program can put
like the fingerprints of literally any
nation, state or person they want in any
cyber attack and blame them.
It was Russian bots.
Yeah. Or they can, you know, like
they've been doing recently, not
actually have any evidence, but then get
a mainstream media highlighting that
says Iran hacked this, China hacked
this. I mean, it doesn't really matter.
Like, it's all just fake, you know? And
a lot of those companies attributing
blame, like Recorded Future, for
example, has a recent one that's been
surfacing. They were created by the CIA
and tell. So like you really want to
trust these guys saying like we were
attacked by this nation, trust like the
intelligence front company that wants to
push all of this through because the CIA
director was in charge of this like
whole thing that mapped out how to like
bring down the banks and launch all of
this I mean, it's just it's
mental.
It seems like it seems like they're
setting up Iran to be the scapegoat here
with what's going on.
Well, sure there's a big Israel
component here. So like that web
partnership against cyber crime I
mentioned is led by a career Israeli uh
intelligence guy named Tal Goldstein.
And then you have this uh stuff that
I've reported on recently well a couple
years ago but it's become recently
relevant like the CTI league which has a
a big relationship with like you know a
key part of the US's DHS as it relates
to critical infrastructure and like
cyber attacks and stuff. And the guy
that created CTI League, Ohad Zadenberg,
has been his whole career blaming Iran
for stuff with little to no evidence for
cyber attacks and is still pretty much
an an active Israeli intelligence asset.
And Israeli intelligence for the past
like 20 years has had like a documented
admitted policy of trying to get the US
to d use as many resources as possible
to further regime change in Iran,
including the US striking Iran first so
Israel doesn't have to. And you even
have former MSAD directors like Mayor
Dean literally saying that and also
saying that MSAD has like unlimited
funds and powers to make that happen and
have a fivef frontont strategy for
regime change in Iran that includes like
goating the US into striking Iran first.
And when you factor in stuff like Israel
and the USS Liberty where Israel tried
to get us involved in one of their
regional wars by blowing up a US ship
and killing, you know, US naval
personnel and then blaming it on Egypt
to try false flagged us hard to try and
get us involved in their war. And now
they're about to have a regional war
again. It's going to escalate. I mean,
it's obviously was I in my opinion just
like planned from the off to escalate to
a regional war because every effort to
deescalate has intentionally been
scuttled by the US and Israel, right?
Not unlike what happened in Ukraine and
like how Boris Johnson when he was in
charge of the UK scuttled like that war
could have ended like very early on and
he scuttled it on purpose. You know,
there's like an intentionality here to
keep this going and to expand it. And
people need to keep in mind too that
Iran is now part of bricks and that
includes like in to an extent some form
of like military alliance, you know, so
there's a potential to like bring in
China and Russia to all of this and you
have all this stuff going on in the
Pacific theater as well. I mean, I don't
want to get too like into geopolitics
right now cuz I also haven't been
following it like super closely. It's
the holidays and that stuff like
develops really rapidly, right? But
there's definitely it's going to go
regional and Israel will not want to be
fighting that alone. And so to get the
US to specifically the US public to
consent, at least a significant faction
of the US public to consent that people
in the US need to feel like they're
under attack also. And there's been this
like framing too of like oh the border
is so porous in the US Mexico border and
Netanyahu saying like you know Hamas
sleeper cells could come to the US and
all the you know if I can add
something on the border really quick. So
the whole mess on the border too in
terms of its intentionality. So it's not
just happening in the US it's it's
happening sim in similar ways in a lot
of other countries. In my opinion this
is one of the main ways they're going to
shoehorn in digital ID. We have to know
who everyone is because there's too many
migrants and we have to know who has
what rights and who can do what. And so
we all need digital ID for everybody.
That's biometric and all of this stuff.
And I'm sure they'll invent something
like, oh, there's fraud. There's fake
IDs. We have to have secure
interoperable IDs just like I designed
by ID 2020 and SG16 and whatever. Yeah.
So that's definitely going to be part of
it. And then you have this whole added
thing of like something crazy is
obviously going to happen with the
economy next year, whether it's provoked
by a cyber attack or whatever. The way
the UN, UNICEF, World Food Program has
set up all of their stuff for
humanitarian aid, is the Worldcoin
model, which is scan your eyeball and we
give you a digital ID and that tells us
whether or not you eat or not. If you
want to get your rations, you have to go
to the wherever the rations are and have
your eyeball scanned. And if there's a
mistake in the system and it decides
you're not you, no food for you. And
this has happened in India's digital ID
system ad to like a significant degree
and they haven't fixed it and they don't
do anything about it and they justified
it by saying that like people's data
will be safer and more secure. It's the
most easily hackable thing in the world.
There was like a a big big- time like
Indian CEO guy that was like, "I'm
publicly going to like put up my Adar ID
number and like look how safe it is and
it was like hacked in like 10 minutes
and people like trolled the crud out of
him, you know? I mean, it's a joke." But
they need to manufacture consent for all
of this stuff and the way they're going
to do that is fear and panic. There's
obviously going to be some sort of
national security crisis they have to
create to bring in that fear and panic,
but they're creating the base issues on
purpose. I mean it's an intentional
decision to have the border in that
state and it's not just happening in the
US it's like a broader thing just like
digital ID is like a global thing and
you know talking about the geopolitical
stuff you know the divide here you know
bricks versus the west specifically like
US UK Israel Europe the EU they all
agree on digital ID so like yeah there's
this geopolitical tension stuff at one
level but go another level up they all
agree about some sort of surveal
available programmable money. Maybe in
the US it's synthetic DPD, CBDC's in
China and the BRICS countries it's
direct issue CBDC. They all agree about
digital IDs that are biometric. They all
agree on agenda 2030 and the sustainable
development goals. And what's
interesting about that? Well, to take it
back to the article in Fluent Finance,
the United Arab Emirates, what are they
setting up financially? What is Fluent
Finance after Farmington gets shut down
specifically doing in the United Arab
Emirates? They're the connective tissue
between the CBDC's, direct issue CBDC's
of Bricsand and the synthetic CBDC's of
the West and the deposit tokens. That's
what they're setting up. That's what
Fluent Finance is doing in the UAE right
now with R3. That's partnered with the
DTCC for the securities stuff that Mark
was talking about earlier and doing the
central bank digital currency for the
UAE and a host of other countries that
are interoperable with a lot of other
ones specifically being overseen by the
BIS. These MCBD projects for like
multi-CB CBDC projects about
interoperability. The goal is to have,
you know, Corda, the R3 DLT, right? Have
that as much run on that as possible,
but what doesn't run on that will be
interoperable with that. So
interoperability is like a key thing to
watch out for. And a lot of these
companies like like Fluent Finance, for
example, are developing this stuff and
like no one has noticed, which I I think
is kind of interesting. Like a lot of
people that are so focused on CBDC's and
they're a threat to human freedom and
all of this are just pointing the finger
at like bricks and not paying attention
to any of these other countries really.
They're just like bis bad. But like you
know Wall Street has plans for this too
and like they're not good either. Like
Jamie Diamond and Jerome Pal are not
coming to the rescue guys. They're
creating the same system under a
different name. Well,
Jamie Diamond programming my dollars to
expire and uh tying it to my carbon
credits or whatever is not any better
than Jerome Powell. I don't know, Janet
Yellen doing it. I mean, it's all the
same garbage.
ALSO |
be wary.
Just to elaborate on that really quick.
So what Mark meant I guess when he
brought up like Lifeloglog and Facebook.
So like Lifelog and these other programs
which also brought us Palanteer, another
Peter Teal PayPal mafia company. They
tried to make this insane ponopticon
program after 9/11 called total
information awareness. Look up the logo.
It's very illuminating. And basically
the goal they put like an Iran Contra
criminal in charge of it who was
obsessed with like mass surveillance for
the purpose of pre-rime and arresting
people for like potentially threatening
the existing status quo of the
government and like protesting war
nonviolently and stuff in charge of this
DARPA public private partnership called
total information awareness that was
going to suck up everyone's data and
predictively you know just enable a
pre-rime type of surveillance drag net.
very unconstitutional stuff. And I think
the the the national security state
realized then because there was a huge
uproar about it that people were not
willing to accept that if the government
was overtly involved, but they would if
it appeared at least as a purely private
sector venture. So the same I think is
true for CBDC's. They've seen this push
back. People don't want CBDC's no to
central bank control. Well, they don't
want the government issuing the CBDC and
the government programming and
surveilling the money. So, I think
they're going to do what they did with
total information awareness. Use private
entities like, you know, JP Morgan, the
same banks that everyone, you know, most
people use now, and have them be the
issuers of the de facto CBDC, or rather
the synthetic CBDC is the term that gets
thrown around some as well. Synthetic
CBDC's, you know, as defined by the
people that use that term is something
like a stable coin with a twist, which
means that the reserves are backed up by
the Fed or backed up with the Fed. And
it's going to get even worse the terms
of like the blending of these of these
groups because that same Carnegie
endowment thing that I mentioned with
like all the big US banks, the Fed, the
ECB, the Bank of England and like tech
companies and stuff, their solution to
cyber attack problems or a coming cyber
pandemic was to basically merge banks,
banking regulators and intelligence
agencies. you know, if and when this big
cyber attack that they're predictively
programming happens, the enemy is going
to be privacy. They're going to be like,
"We can't have privacy anymore." That's
what they're going to say. I guarantee
that because that's the only way they
can, you know, basically force adoption
of all this stuff they want to do, which
is CBDC's digital ID is they want
everything you do online to be
completely surveillable, and that
includes financial transactions, like
specifically financial transactions. And
so people for a long time have rightly
pointed out that digital IDs and CBDC's
are like, you know, they go together,
right? You get you get both. It's not
just like one or the other. Like it's a
very like integrated thing. You know,
this is all also tied up with this uh
goal to have the driver's license for
the internet that you have to have, you
know, your digital ID or government
issued ID tied to everything you do
online. Whatever happens with this
thing, they're going to blame whoever
they want really because we know with
like Wikileaks Vault 7, right? The CIA
through the Umbbridge program can put
like the fingerprints of literally any
nation, state or person they want in any
cyber attack and blame them.
It was Russian bots.
Yeah. Or they can, you know, like
they've been doing recently, not
actually have any evidence, but then get
a mainstream media highlighting that
says Iran hacked this, China hacked
this. I mean, it doesn't really matter.
Like, it's all just fake, you know? And
a lot of those companies attributing
blame, like Recorded Future, for
example, has a recent one that's been
surfacing. They were created by the CIA
and tell. So like you really want to
trust these guys saying like we were
attacked by this nation, trust like the
intelligence front company that wants to
push all of this through because the CIA
director was in charge of this like
whole thing that mapped out how to like
bring down the banks and launch all of
this I mean, it's just it's
mental.
It seems like it seems like they're
setting up Iran to be the scapegoat here
with what's going on.
Well, sure there's a big Israel
component here. So like that web
partnership against cyber crime I
mentioned is led by a career Israeli uh
intelligence guy named Tal Goldstein.
And then you have this uh stuff that
I've reported on recently well a couple
years ago but it's become recently
relevant like the CTI league which has a
a big relationship with like you know a
key part of the US's DHS as it relates
to critical infrastructure and like
cyber attacks and stuff. And the guy
that created CTI League, Ohad Zadenberg,
has been his whole career blaming Iran
for stuff with little to no evidence for
cyber attacks and is still pretty much
an an active Israeli intelligence asset.
And Israeli intelligence for the past
like 20 years has had like a documented
admitted policy of trying to get the US
to d use as many resources as possible
to further regime change in Iran,
including the US striking Iran first so
Israel doesn't have to. And you even
have former MSAD directors like Mayor
Dean literally saying that and also
saying that MSAD has like unlimited
funds and powers to make that happen and
have a fivef frontont strategy for
regime change in Iran that includes like
goating the US into striking Iran first.
And when you factor in stuff like Israel
and the USS Liberty where Israel tried
to get us involved in one of their
regional wars by blowing up a US ship
and killing, you know, US naval
personnel and then blaming it on Egypt
to try false flagged us hard to try and
get us involved in their war. And now
they're about to have a regional war
again. It's going to escalate. I mean,
it's obviously was I in my opinion just
like planned from the off to escalate to
a regional war because every effort to
deescalate has intentionally been
scuttled by the US and Israel, right?
Not unlike what happened in Ukraine and
like how Boris Johnson when he was in
charge of the UK scuttled like that war
could have ended like very early on and
he scuttled it on purpose. You know,
there's like an intentionality here to
keep this going and to expand it. And
people need to keep in mind too that
Iran is now part of bricks and that
includes like in to an extent some form
of like military alliance, you know, so
there's a potential to like bring in
China and Russia to all of this and you
have all this stuff going on in the
Pacific theater as well. I mean, I don't
want to get too like into geopolitics
right now cuz I also haven't been
following it like super closely. It's
the holidays and that stuff like
develops really rapidly, right? But
there's definitely it's going to go
regional and Israel will not want to be
fighting that alone. And so to get the
US to specifically the US public to
consent, at least a significant faction
of the US public to consent that people
in the US need to feel like they're
under attack also. And there's been this
like framing too of like oh the border
is so porous in the US Mexico border and
Netanyahu saying like you know Hamas
sleeper cells could come to the US and
all the you know if I can add
something on the border really quick. So
the whole mess on the border too in
terms of its intentionality. So it's not
just happening in the US it's it's
happening sim in similar ways in a lot
of other countries. In my opinion this
is one of the main ways they're going to
shoehorn in digital ID. We have to know
who everyone is because there's too many
migrants and we have to know who has
what rights and who can do what. And so
we all need digital ID for everybody.
That's biometric and all of this stuff.
And I'm sure they'll invent something
like, oh, there's fraud. There's fake
IDs. We have to have secure
interoperable IDs just like I designed
by ID 2020 and SG16 and whatever. Yeah.
So that's definitely going to be part of
it. And then you have this whole added
thing of like something crazy is
obviously going to happen with the
economy next year, whether it's provoked
by a cyber attack or whatever. The way
the UN, UNICEF, World Food Program has
set up all of their stuff for
humanitarian aid, is the Worldcoin
model, which is scan your eyeball and we
give you a digital ID and that tells us
whether or not you eat or not. If you
want to get your rations, you have to go
to the wherever the rations are and have
your eyeball scanned. And if there's a
mistake in the system and it decides
you're not you, no food for you. And
this has happened in India's digital ID
system ad to like a significant degree
and they haven't fixed it and they don't
do anything about it and they justified
it by saying that like people's data
will be safer and more secure. It's the
most easily hackable thing in the world.
There was like a a big big- time like
Indian CEO guy that was like, "I'm
publicly going to like put up my Adar ID
number and like look how safe it is and
it was like hacked in like 10 minutes
and people like trolled the crud out of
him, you know? I mean, it's a joke." But
they need to manufacture consent for all
of this stuff and the way they're going
to do that is fear and panic. There's
obviously going to be some sort of
national security crisis they have to
create to bring in that fear and panic,
but they're creating the base issues on
purpose. I mean it's an intentional
decision to have the border in that
state and it's not just happening in the
US it's like a broader thing just like
digital ID is like a global thing and
you know talking about the geopolitical
stuff you know the divide here you know
bricks versus the west specifically like
US UK Israel Europe the EU they all
agree on digital ID so like yeah there's
this geopolitical tension stuff at one
level but go another level up they all
agree about some sort of surveal
available programmable money. Maybe in
the US it's synthetic DPD, CBDC's in
China and the BRICS countries it's
direct issue CBDC. They all agree about
digital IDs that are biometric. They all
agree on agenda 2030 and the sustainable
development goals. And what's
interesting about that? Well, to take it
back to the article in Fluent Finance,
the United Arab Emirates, what are they
setting up financially? What is Fluent
Finance after Farmington gets shut down
specifically doing in the United Arab
Emirates? They're the connective tissue
between the CBDC's, direct issue CBDC's
of Bricsand and the synthetic CBDC's of
the West and the deposit tokens. That's
what they're setting up. That's what
Fluent Finance is doing in the UAE right
now with R3. That's partnered with the
DTCC for the securities stuff that Mark
was talking about earlier and doing the
central bank digital currency for the
UAE and a host of other countries that
are interoperable with a lot of other
ones specifically being overseen by the
BIS. These MCBD projects for like
multi-CB CBDC projects about
interoperability. The goal is to have,
you know, Corda, the R3 DLT, right? Have
that as much run on that as possible,
but what doesn't run on that will be
interoperable with that. So
interoperability is like a key thing to
watch out for. And a lot of these
companies like like Fluent Finance, for
example, are developing this stuff and
like no one has noticed, which I I think
is kind of interesting. Like a lot of
people that are so focused on CBDC's and
they're a threat to human freedom and
all of this are just pointing the finger
at like bricks and not paying attention
to any of these other countries really.
They're just like bis bad. But like you
know Wall Street has plans for this too
and like they're not good either. Like
Jamie Diamond and Jerome Pal are not
coming to the rescue guys. They're
creating the same system under a
different name. Well,
Jamie Diamond programming my dollars to
expire and uh tying it to my carbon
credits or whatever is not any better
than Jerome Powell. I don't know, Janet
Yellen doing it. I mean, it's all the
same garbage.
