Monday, July 18, 2022

The Proverbial Fix Is In....The Proverbial Fix Is In

 

The Proverbial Fix Is In


Trudeau unveils Canada’s international proof-of-vaccination for COVID-19

Posted: 27 Mar 2022 06:54 PM PDT

 https://globalnews.ca/news/8286078/covid-coronavirus-vaccine-passport-certificate-federal-travel/?fbclid=IwAR38SUC6Pv8aLGNht93lIxTvfo4Y3ULJNLHrX-hTK3xj8XF9B9pBf0lZ_NE

Trudeau unveils Canada’s international proof-of-vaccination for COVID-19

“I’m happy to confirm that all provinces and territories have confirmed that they will be moving forward with a standardized national proof of vaccination,” Trudeau said, speaking to reporters.

He added that Saskatchewan, Ontario, Québec, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and all three territories have put this national standard into use.

Click to play video: 'Canada lifts blanket travel advisory on non-essential travel'Canada lifts blanket travel advisory on non-essential travel
Canada lifts blanket travel advisory on non-essential travel – Oct 22, 2021

That’s because the new national standard uses the provincial vaccine certificate as its framework. If you’ve already downloaded that provincial proof of vaccination document and it has the federal seal of approval in the top right corner, the government says you should be all set.

“You can download it into your phone, you can print it out, you can ask for a copy by mail if you don’t have those capacities, but you are now able to show proofs of vaccination immediately in all those provinces, and all other provinces have agreed and are working hard to come online,” he said.

The vaccine passport will have a common look and feel across the country, according to officials, including a “Canada” wordmark in the top corner.

Canadians will be able to use the proof of vaccination system both within Canada and for international travel, the officials said.

While the Canadian government’s webpage about the passport system reminds Canadians to “avoid non-essential travel,” should you choose to, this certificate should be uploaded into the ArriveCAN app for your return to Canada.

However, “this proof does not guarantee you entry to another country,” the webpage reads.

“Before you travel, you must check the rules of your destination country and the countries you transit through,” it explains.

“Provinces and territories may also ask you to use this proof to access non-essential services.”

If you’ve already downloaded the proof of vaccination certificate with the “Canada” wordmark on the top right corner and your vaccination status hasn’t changed, you won’t need to download anything new, according to the website.

Regardless, Canadians should “be sure to bring a digital and paper copy with you when you travel.”

Officials said the proof of vaccination system also complies with the SMART Health Card standard, which uses technology that will allow officials to verify and authenticate the information without giving access to any other health or identity information.

The system is also supposed to be tamper-proof, the officials added, as it detects any changes to the document after it has been issued.

Click to play video: 'Federal government unveils standardized COVID-19 vaccine passport for international travel'Federal government unveils standardized COVID-19 vaccine passport for international travel
Federal government unveils standardized COVID-19 vaccine passport for international travel – Oct 21, 2021

The government worked “very closely” with airlines to ensure the certificate will also be “seamless” to verify, Trudeau said.

“It will be a step, for the vast majority of people, at the virtual check-in where they simply have to scan their QR code, and they will get a boarding pass that is clearly marked upon it ‘vaccination approved’ So there is no actual slowdown,” he said.

“It’s a single extra step on check in, in a digital way, but it will not be overly onerous for anyone in the process.

He added that when airline employees check the name and the gate number on the boarding pass, there will also be a “green check mark or whatever it is” that will tell them the vaccination requirements have been met.

Canadians who are travelling will have to show ID alongside their proof of vaccination certificate, according to the government’s website.

“Your name and date of birth will be checked against your other ID, such as your passport or status card,” it said.

“Your proof of vaccination and your passport or status card are separate documents and are not digitally connected. Your Canadian passport or status card does not contain vaccination information.”

Whether businesses choose to request ID alongside the vaccine certificates is up to them and the provinces where they’re located, according to Alexander Cohen, the press secretary for Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino.

“That’s entirely up to either the provinces or the individual business…because our role in this is creating something for international (use),” Cohen said.

Cohen added that he doesn’t foresee Canadian travellers running into any issues using these certificates on the global stage.

“We expect that it’s going to be accepted by all countries,” he said.

“Right now, every country that is accepting generally for travelers or visitors is accepting all proof of vaccination.”

Reaction rolls in to certificate rollout

Both industry and public health voices are applauding this latest step in vaccine certification. Beth Potter, who is the President and CEO of the Tourism Industry Association of Canada, said the proof of vaccination system is “really good.”

“You’re not going to have to juggle,” Potter said.

“You know that you’ve got your vaccine certification, proof from whatever province or territory in Canada, and you can use it whenever you travel. And I think that’s fantastic.”

The one thing Potter was worried about seeing was a patchwork of systems across the country, she said.

“Not every business owner around the world may know where New Brunswick is or where the Yukon is,” she said.

“But they do know Canada, and so having that unifier, I think it’s incredibly important.”

Click to play video: 'New Brunswick premier says proof-of-vaccination QR system on track to come mid-November'New Brunswick premier says proof-of-vaccination QR system on track to come mid-November
New Brunswick premier says proof-of-vaccination QR system on track to come mid-November – Oct 21, 2021

A public health expert also agreed that the latest vaccine certification development is a welcome one. Julia Zarb, who is a professor at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health, said the new certificate is “helpful.”

“It standardizes a template, a recognizable look and feel,” she said.

“There is a logo on it that is consistent across the board.”

While the certificate isn’t available in every single province just yet, Zarb said things are headed in the right direction.

“We need to get standardization, but it’s not something that will happen overnight, and anybody who’s worked in technology for a long time can tell you it’s never happened overnight, and we’ve had a lot of bumps and bruises trying to go down the road of thinking it might,” Zarb explained.

“So, I guess, be patient.”

Potter said she’s hopeful that the implementation of this national system will be smooth.

“It’s free and it’s simple to use. So we’re hoping that this will be a relatively painless move,” she said.

“You know, as long as the vaccine is required, we wanted to make sure that the system that was put in place was one that is simple to understand, simple to use, but not onerous on the business owners and on the business employees.”

As for Canadians considering travel, Potter said she hopes this will give them that extra push.

“It’s getting safer to travel all the time, and proof of vaccination certification is another tool in everyone’s toolbox that they can use to feel confident that they can travel safely,” she said.

“We encourage Canadians to really start thinking about that next trip, whether it’s for leisure or for business travel, and to get back out there and explore our great country.”

— With files from Global News’ Crystal Oag

Invest in the Digital Assets Transformation h

Posted: 27 Mar 2022 06:22 PM PDT

 Invest in the Digital Assets Transformation          https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/digital-assets/dapp-invest-in-the-digital-assets-transformation/

 

Invest in the Digital Assets Transformation

April 14, 2021

Read Time 2 MIN

 
 

The digital transformation is underway. In recent years, digital assets have started to mature, evidenced by increased global adoption by both retail and institutional investors. Against this backdrop, we believe that companies involved in the digital transformation of the global economy represents a long-term structural growth opportunity that is becoming more and more accessible to investors.

What Are Digital Assets?

The term “digital assets” encompasses a broad range of technology and applications, commonly referred to as blockchain or distributed ledger technology. Digital assets can take a variety of forms, and are not just limited to cryptocurrencies.

What Are Digital Assets?

Companies at the Forefront of the Digital Asset Transformation

The companies involved in the digital transformation are distinctly different from digital assets themselves. Digital transformation companies may range from digital asset mining to hardware to exchanges that facilitate the trading of digital assets.

Digital Asset Companies at the Forefront of the Digital Transformation

Digital transformation companies may engage in only one of these business lines, or they may engage in multiple, depending on their goals, capabilities and focus within the broader digital transformation space. Below are two quick examples to illustrate how different companies are generating digital transformation-related revenues.

Square* (SQ), the top weighted payment gateway company in the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, helps sellers start, run and grow their businesses. Investors and consumers can purchase cryptocurrency on Square’s popular CashApp. According to SEC filings, Square “recognizes revenue when customers purchase bitcoin and it is transferred to the customer’s account.” In 2020, that amounted to $4.57 billion in bitcoin-related revenues, an increase of 785% from the year before.1

Voyager Digital(VYGR) focuses on enabling users to buy and sell cryptocurrencies across multiple exchanges in one account. According to SEC filings, Voyager “offers investors, developers and platform providers a fully functional suite of APIs and mobile apps to allow anyone the ability to invest, earn and secure multiple types of digital assets.” As of March 31, 2021, Voyager had over $2.4 billion in assets under management and 270,000 funded accounts.2

Digital Transformation Companies Reflect a Structural Growth Opportunity

The opportunity set of publicly traded, pure-play digital transformation companies is still young, but has grown in both size and revenues over the last few years. Despite underlying volatility in digital assets themselves, many publicly traded companies are investing heavily in new business lines to position themselves favorably as digital asset usage and adoption continues to accelerate.

The Growth of Publicly Traded Digital Transformation Companies (2012 – 2020)

The Growth of Publicly Traded Digital Transformation Companies (2012 - 2020)

Source: VanEck. Revenues and market caps reflect pure-play digital asset companies as defined by MVIS and included in the composition of the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index on 3/31/21. See important disclosures and index descriptions at end.

The digital transformation opportunity set currently has fewer listed companies compared to more mature industries. However, we believe that as digital assets use cases and adoption grow over time, these early-mover companies may benefit, and that more digital transformation companies will go public.

 

Presidential Documents Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets Executive Order 14067 of March 9, 2022

Posted: 27 Mar 2022 06:16 PM PDT

 Blogger note:  A long read of What is going on ..What is happening and how FAST Also see for a quick overview https://www.coinfirm.com/blog/whs-executive-order-on-digital-assets/

You can read it al right HERE :  https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-03-14/pdf/2022-05471.pdf


Page 1

Executive Order 14067 of March 9, 2022
Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets

 
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. Advances in digital and distributed ledger technology
for financial services have led to dramatic growth in markets for digital
assets, with profound implications for the protection of consumers, investors,
and businesses, including data privacy and security; financial stability and
systemic risk; crime; national security; the ability to exercise human rights;
financial inclusion and equity; and energy demand and climate change.
In November 2021, non–state issued digital assets reached a combined market
capitalization of $3 trillion, up from approximately $14 billion in early
November 2016. Monetary authorities globally are also exploring, and in
some cases introducing, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
While many activities involving digital assets are within the scope of existing
domestic laws and regulations, an area where the United States has been
a global leader, growing development and adoption of digital assets and
related innovations, as well as inconsistent controls to defend against certain
key risks, necessitate an evolution and alignment of the United States Govern-
ment approach to digital assets. The United States has an interest in respon-
sible financial innovation, expanding access to safe and affordable financial
services, and reducing the cost of domestic and cross-border funds transfers
and payments, including through the continued modernization of public
payment systems. We must take strong steps to reduce the risks that digital
assets could pose to consumers, investors, and business protections; financial
stability and financial system integrity; combating and preventing crime
and illicit finance; national security; the ability to exercise human rights;
financial inclusion and equity; and climate change and pollution.
Sec. 2. Objectives. The principal policy objectives of the United States with
respect to digital assets are as follows:
(a) We must protect consumers, investors, and businesses in the United
States. The unique and varied features of digital assets can pose significant
financial risks to consumers, investors, and businesses if appropriate protec-
tions are not in place. In the absence of sufficient oversight and standards,
firms providing digital asset services may provide inadequate protections
for sensitive financial data, custodial and other arrangements relating to
customer assets and funds, or disclosures of risks associated with investment.
Cybersecurity and market failures at major digital asset exchanges and trading
platforms have resulted in billions of dollars in losses. The United States
should ensure that safeguards are in place and promote the responsible
development of digital assets to protect consumers, investors, and businesses;
maintain privacy; and shield against arbitrary or unlawful surveillance, which
can contribute to human rights abuses.
(b) We must protect United States and global financial stability and mitigate
systemic risk. Some digital asset trading platforms and service providers
have grown rapidly in size and complexity and may not be subject to
or in compliance with appropriate regulations or supervision. Digital asset
issuers, exchanges and trading platforms, and intermediaries whose activities
may increase risks to financial stability, should, as appropriate, be subject
to and in compliance with regulatory and supervisory standards that govern
traditional market infrastructures and financial firms, in line with the general...

 


 

How the Liberals and New Democrats made a deal to preserve the minority government

Posted: 27 Mar 2022 06:21 PM PDT

 

From: CBC Politics: Minority Report <info@newsletters.cbc.ca>
Date: Sun., Mar. 27, 2022, 7:02 a.m.
Subject: Minority Report: Red-orange alliance
 


CBC News

View in browser

Minority Report


Sunday, March 27, 2022
 

The Rideau room where it happened
 

A historic deal is set to see Justin Trudeau remain in the prime minister's office until at least 2025 in exchange for progress on key policies, if all goes to plan for the Liberals and NDP. The CBC's Aaron Wherry, Rosemary Barton, David Cochrane and Vassy Kapelos break down how the agreement came to be and how it might shake out.

Then, digital writer Christian Paas-Lang puts this deal into historical context, looking back at previous minority parliaments and how this one will stack up — should the deal last.

Ryan Maloney

How the Liberals and New Democrats made a deal to preserve the minority government

Aaron Wherry, Rosemary Barton, David Cochrane and Vassy Kapelos

The residence at 7 Rideau Gate — a 19th-century home nestled between Rideau Hall and 24 Sussex in Ottawa's New Edinburgh neighborhood — is typically used as Canada's official guest house for visiting dignitaries and foreign leaders.

On March 14, an otherwise uneventful Monday in the nation's capital, it was also where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh came to a historic agreement between their parties during a three-hour meeting.

By the following Sunday, their officials had worked out the final wording of a tentative agreement. At 4 p.m. the next day, a note from the Privy Council Office alerted cabinet ministers to a cabinet meeting abruptly scheduled for that evening at 7:15 p.m. Liberal MPs were told of a virtual caucus meeting at 8:30 p.m., while NDP MPs were called to their own meeting for 8:45 p.m.

In those meetings, Liberals and New Democrats were let in on this week's big surprise, first reported by the CBC's Vassy Kapelos shortly after 9 p.m. on March 21: a confidence-and-supply agreement that would allow the Liberals to govern with NDP support until 2025, contingent on the implementation of a negotiated list of policies and priorities.

READ: How the Liberal-NDP agreement will work and what it might mean for Canadians

The key to making the deal work in practice might be found in the agreement's second sentence: "To ensure coordination on this arrangement, both Parties commit to a guiding principle of 'no surprises.'"

The deal itself should not have come as a complete surprise. Initial discussions between senior Liberals and New Democrats happened after last fall's election; Maclean's broke news of those conversations in October.

But those early talks did not deliver anything concrete and the conversation was more or less put aside.
 

'We just needed a little break'


"There was no animosity. We just needed a little break," a senior Liberal source with direct knowledge of the talks, speaking on condition they not be named, told the CBC this week.

Unlike similar confidence-and-supply agreements in Ontario, British Columbia and the Yukon — which came about very quickly after elections — there was no great urgency to the negotiations between Trudeau and Singh. The Liberal minority government was relatively secure and found the support it needed to pass several measures before the House of Commons adjourned in December.

Still, reports of possible collaboration were greeted enthusiastically in November by Erin O'Toole, who was still hanging on as Conservative leader. Faced with his own problems, O'Toole condemned what he described as a Liberal-NDP "coalition."

MORE: Everything we know about the Liberal-NDP dental care proposal

But unlike the negotiations between Jack Layton's NDP and Stephane Dion's Liberals in the feverish fall of 2008, these Liberal-NDP talks do not appear to have considered a coalition government at any point.

"We want to be independent enough to be able to be critical. We want to be able to oppose and to call for more," an NDP source, speaking on condition they not be named, said this week.

The discussions picked up again in the new year. As the Canadian Press reported this week, a phone call between Trudeau and Singh after the birth of Singh's daughter in January helped to get the ball rolling again.

Those discussions involved a small number of advisers — Trudeau's chief of staff Katie Telford and senior adviser Jeremy Broadhurst for the Liberals, Singh's chief of staff Jennifer Howard and NDP national director Anne McGrath for the New Democrats.

 
[image of the Liberal MP Randeep Sarai in the House of Commons]

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, left, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, prepare for the start of the federal election English-language Leaders debate in Gatineau, Que., on Thursday, Sept. 9, 2021. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

The NDP source said that maintaining a tight circle lowered the likelihood of further leaks. Due to the pandemic, most of the discussions happened by phone or video conference.

The bulk of the deal seems to have come together in the last two weeks. An NDP source said the party wanted to have an agreement in place in time to influence the government's spring budget.

A Liberal source said that, as the March 14 discussion was concluding, news was also breaking of a NATO leaders' summit scheduled for Brussels this week. That meant a deal needed to be completed quickly if it was to be announced before the prime minister departed.

According to the Liberal source, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland was kept in the loop and other cabinet ministers were consulted about aspects that touched on their departments.
 

Agreeing on the 'blindingly obvious'


NDP officials reached out to people involved in the confidence-and-supply agreements signed in British Columbia in 2017 and Yukon in 2021. A Liberal source acknowledged that the B.C. deal was an important reference point. At least three of the primary negotiators also had firsthand experience — McGrath, Telford and Broadhurst were involved in the coalition talks in 2008.

The Liberal source argued that while the government was able to get its most important pieces of legislation through a divided House of Commons in the last Parliament, the process was so time-consuming that other bills — like those on conversion therapy and justice reform — fell by the wayside, even though the government knew it had the votes it needed.

"We don't have to see eye-to-eye on everything but can we at least find a way on the things that are blindingly obvious that we agree on?" the Liberal source said, explaining the motivation for a deal.

READ: Conservative interim leader accuses Liberals of 'power grab' after Trudeau makes a deal with the NDP

Then 2022 began and brought with it unforeseen events — an anti-vaccine mandate convoy protest occupying downtown Ottawa, followed by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Those events consumed more of the government's time. But the Liberal source also suggested that global turmoil was increasing the pressure on progressive politicians to show they had answers to concerns about the cost of living.

While the convoy was bringing O'Toole's time as Conservative leader to an end, it apparently was showing the Liberals and New Democrats that they could work with each other. While the NDP offered qualified approval in public for the government's use of the Emergencies Act to end the convoy protest, the two sides were speaking behind the scenes about the law's deployment and the Liberals coordinated briefings with government officials to answer the NDP's questions.
 

Building 'relationships'


An NDP source said the two parties worked together in a "very mature way" after the invocation of the Emergencies Act and were "honest and forthright" with each other.

"There was more contact between the leaders in discussions about how to deal with it," the source said in an interview. "And I think that helped build the relationships at the leader and staff level that helped us have these discussions [about an accord]."

While Trudeau and Singh clashed directly and sometimes fiercely during last fall's election, there was significant overlap in the parties' broad priorities on affordable housing, health care, climate change and reconciliation.

WATCH: The political strategy, implications of the Liberal-NDP deal | At Issue

But the two parties couldn't agree on everything. Electoral reform was raised but dropped when it became clear the two sides weren't willing to abandon their preferred alternatives — proportional representation for the NDP, a ranked ballot for the Liberals. Instead, under the heading of "making democracy work for people," the Liberals and NDP agreed to revive a series of proposals for making it easier to vote.

Singh's NDP proposed expanding dental care in the 2019 and 2021 elections and the Trudeau government referred to dental care in its throne speech after the 2019 election, but the pandemic soon consumed all attention. The new accord became an opportunity to get something done.

 

ABSTENTION ? Do your own research, should you or should you not ... abstain from voting?

Posted: 17 Mar 2022 08:38 AM PDT

 Bloggers note: Do your own research, should you or should you not ...  abstain from voting
 

 Abstention - Wikipedia

Abstention is a term in election procedure for when a participant in a vote either does not go to vote (on election day) or, in parliamentary procedure, ...

People also ask

May 12, 2020 — Political parties are singled out as well, because some attributed the lowered voting rate to the difficulties people might have in finding any ...
by JA Laponce1967Cited by 17 — The studies of non-voting made in the United States and Europe have firmly established that failure to vote is associated with conflicting political prefer-.
Feb 26, 2020 — Just over three-quarters (77%) of Canadians reported voting in the 2019 federal election, unchanged from the 2015 election.
Nov 3, 2020 — If early voting trends are any indication, a record number of Americans could vote in the 2020 presidential election. As of this writing, ...
We particularly encourage you to support parties and candidates who are strong advocates of reforming our electoral system to proportional representation and ...
by JA Laponce1967Cited by 17 — The studies of non-voting made in the United States and Europe have firmly established that failure to vote is associated with conflicting political ...
Elections BC Non-Voters Survey. Final Report. METHODS. METHODS. This section describes the survey design and administration, the sample, and analysis of.
97 pages

Why people choose not to vote in elections - CNBC

https://www.cnbc.com › 2020/10/30 › why-people-choos...

Nonvoters: Who They Are, What They Think - Pew Research ...

https://www.pewresearch.org › ... › Voter Participation
  • Nov 1, 2012 — Overview In the final days before Tuesday's election, most of the focus will be on those likely to cast votes. But a sizable minority of ...
Apr 9, 2020 — The media and political class's depiction of abstention as a byproduct of class and racial privilege is a lie.
 

 

THINK TWICE>>>and maybe 3 times: Ontario will no longer require people show proof of vaccination to enter any indoor spaces.

Posted: 07 Mar 2022 04:35 AM PST

 THINK TWICE>>>and maybe 3 times             

Ontario will no longer require people show proof of vaccination to enter any indoor spaces.     

    https://theintercept.com/2022/01/01/covid-vaccine-passports-surveillance/ 

“YEAH I USE the pass. What should I be afraid of?” That’s Jack, a friend who works in state and city politics, responding to a poll I posted on Facebook about digital Covid-19 vaccination passports. “Are you using one?” it asked. “Why’d you download it instead of using the paper card? Do you have any fears about it?”

The responses were untroubled. Using it: mostly yes. “Now that theater is back, [New York] Excelsior passes are handy, since proof of vax is mandatory,” wrote a critic. A retired teacher noted that the app is more durable; paper “rumples” and gets lost.

And fears? Mostly no. I sent Jack a few off the top of my head: “Concerns about privacy, misuse of digitized biodata, lack of transparency, more info in hands of tech companies and the state in some unknown collaboration.”

“The state already had vax data,” he replied. “I never considered the rest. Which answers your question about whether people were worried, in my case.”

The digital Covid vaccination certification, or “passport,” is a mobile app that instantaneously affirms the vaccinated status, Covid test results, birth date, gender, and/or other identifiers of its holder. The information is usually mosaicked in a QR code, read by a proprietary scanner, and linked to a government registry. Led by New York, California, and Louisiana, as many as 30 states are rolling them out. The Biden administration announced last spring that it would wrangle them under national standards but so far it hasn’t. Internationally, the EU and a growing number of countries are adopting them, from repressive regimes like Bahrain to democracies like Denmark.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern heralded her country’s My Vaccine Pass as the keycard to the kingdom. “It’s actually really straightforward. If you’ve got a vaccine pass, you can do everything,” she announced, flashing a friendly shark grin. “Basically, that’s it.”

Not everybody is as nonchalant as Jack or as gung-ho as the PM. Twenty U.S. states have banned the passes, and hashtags like #NoVaccinePassports are proliferating on both sides of the Atlantic. “Spoiler alert,” tweeted British DJ, record producer, and anti-vaccine conspiracy-monger Lange. “They are not planning on removing vax passports once introduced. This is just the first step to get you conditioned to accepting government restrictions in your daily life via your mobile phone. This digital ID is going to expand to all aspects of your life.” Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene called the passport “Biden’s mark of the beast.”

Normally I’d rather have the mark of the beast tattooed on my forehead than write these words, but: Marjorie is not entirely wrong.

I’ve been double-vaxxed and boosted. Needless to say, I want to do everything — or at least go to the movies. I’ve handed my paper vaccine card to a dozen gatekeepers, but I’m not getting New York’s Excelsior Pass. So I too am bartering shreds of my personal data for brief furloughs from the cage. I’m not pure.

Still, I’m troubled. What else am I — are we — trading away? There’s no doubt something like the vaccine passport is here for good, beyond Covid. In the end, we may decide we want this thing. But we should go into it with our eyes open.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE detractors’ suspicions. Every government introducing a vaccine certification vows that their use is voluntary and no personal information will be held beyond its necessity. International bodies including the World Health Organization, the EU, and the International Chamber of Commerce are crafting regulatory standards. But governments are far from unanimous even on such basics as whether you need to show the pass to enter a bar — much less on how long and by whom our intimate information will be held, owned, or overseen.

New York, for one, is not expecting to mothball the technology when Covid wanes. Along with IBM, the designer, state bureaucrats are “exploring how the platform could be retrofitted to verify other types of records and credentials,” according to Vox. Experience with the Excelsior Pass has “accelerated our thinking about digital governments,” said the architect of the program. Will President Joe Biden use the passport to enforce his federal employee vaccine mandate? Then what? Once biodata are collected and filed, cautioned Hamid Kahn of the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition, which organizes in Los Angeles’s poorest and most policed communities, “there’s no delete button.”

When biometric data — bodily attributes digitized — are married to surveillance technology, both the potential for profit and the ambitions of the techno-futurists inflate without limit. One industry analyst predicts the global biometrics market will grow 15 percent annually, reaching nearly $105 billion by 2028. The British tech firm Onfido envisions a seamless EU-wide identify verification, or IDV, system for online gambling, telemedicine, car rentals, electronic voting, “and more.” Scientists in academe and industry are working on a global biodata repository. It would be naïve to assume these networks would not be linked.

In 2020, Onfido called its immunity passport in development the “linchpin of a new normality in a post-COVID19 society.” This year, the company’s chief privacy officer (an Orwellian job title if ever there was one) told Biometric Update that proven immunity to the virus du jour might become a “basic permission attribute.” A Swedish company has introduced a vaccine certification microchip that can be implanted under the skin.

What should I be afraid of?

I HAVE NO beef with data collection per se. Data are the lifeblood of what Michel Foucault called the biopolitical state, which governs by maximizing life and sustaining populations rather than by threatening violence and imposing death, as earlier regimes had done. Logically, one of the chief institutions of the biopolitical state is public health. A big part of public health is containing transmissible, fatal diseases: keeping illness from becoming epidemic, and epidemics from mushrooming into pandemics. In the last century, that job has been the ambit of epidemiology, the science of the spread of disease.

Epidemiologists have a lot of tools, but many are stored in the drawer marked “surveillance” — identifying the first cases of a superspreader like Ebola, avian flu, or Covid-19; tracing and testing the patients’ contacts; treating or isolating those who’ve been infected — and all the while gathering and analyzing data to predict the routes the pathogen will take and the bodies it will hijack to keep traveling. The data then go into larger databases to parse when the next murderous bug comes along.

Biodata can serve the public good — or they can give ammunition to eugenicists or evidence to the prosecutors of an HIV-positive person who failed to inform a lover of his serostatus, a felony in some states. In the biopolitical state, there is no bright line between benign and malign surveillance.

In the biopolitical state, there is no bright line between benign and malign surveillance.

Similarly, prevention and cure can look a lot like discipline and punishment. When the Trump administration squandered the opportunity to use less draconian epidemiological measures, the nation was pitched into extreme action: lockdown. Jeffrey Escoffier, a historian of sexuality, queer activism, and public health, was alarmed. Quarantine is a grave incursion on liberty, he told me. During the two decades he served as director of health media and marketing for the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene — “propaganda minister for the biopolitical state” — the decision to impose it on even one person was taken with caution. But lock up everyone? Self-isolation is sometimes necessary. It is also the carceral function of the health-protecting state; the doctor moonlights as a prison warden.

During Italy’s lockdown, the philosopher Giorgio Agamben blogged about the “techno-medical despotism” so focused on eliminating the risk of contagion to preserve mere biological existence — what he calls “bare life” — that it prohibited everything that makes human society meaningful, from dating to democracy. “How could we have accepted,” he asked in a New York Times interview, “in the name of a risk that we couldn’t even quantify, not only that the people who are dear to us … should have to die alone but also — and this is something that had never happened before in all of history from Antigone to today — that their corpses should be burned without a funeral?” Actually it has happened before: during the plagues of the Middle Ages, according to Foucault, the birthplace of the biopolitical state.

The Coronavirus CrisisRead Our Complete CoverageThe Coronavirus Crisis

But we don’t have to look back that far to see a wish for perfect security trumping everything else that matters. The surveillance technologies of the War on Contagion are inherited from the War on Terror, and the software is encoded with the same forever-war mentality: Both fight risk rather than actual threat. When the enemy is protean, like suicide bombers and viruses, the calculation of risk is easily manipulated and often subjective. My partner and I used to argue about whether to wash the milk cartons from the supermarket. Now we listen to delphic sentences like this one, from Chief White House medical adviser Anthony Fauci speaking of the omicron variant on NPR: “You have so many cases it essentially obviates any diminution of the severity, because of the quantitative number of cases that you’ll get with such a highly transmissible virus.” Then we Google the latest statistics and argue about whether to eat out.

Risk cloaked in statistics is a ghost in a suit. It starts to resemble a person. Who is the terrorist? Who is the Covid carrier? Among the contradictions of the pandemic is that collective safety requires honesty and mutual trust, yet the expression of that trust is vigilant mutual suspicion. The best bet is to fear everyone.

The vaccination passport seems to solve this problem, replacing suspicion with certainty. But in admitting the vaccinated and deporting the unvaccinated, it also sorts the good biocitizen from the outlaw. The rhetoric of contagion has long mobilized xenophobia and legitimized racist and eugenicist citizenship and immigration policies (think Donald Trump’s “Chinese virus”). American University historian Alan M. Kraut calls this “medicalized nativism.”

“Securing borders is all about fear. The action of fear is to restrict movement.”

“Passports have everything to do with borders,” says Jenell Johnson, associate professor of rhetoric, politics, and culture at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a co-editor of “Biocitizenship: The Politics of Bodies, Governance, and Power.” “Securing borders is all about fear. The action of fear is to restrict movement. The passport allows for movement in both physical and economic ways. It also immediately suggests belonging — the people who belong and people who don’t.”

A pocket-size dossier of one’s “attributes of permission” affords its holder a sense of inclusion, and thus protection from a menacing world. My Facebook friends told me as much. “What I like about Excelsior is the extra level of confirmation it offers — the info individuals input is checked against a database,” responded one woman. “Basic steps to avoid fraud make me feel better about being in a venue with similarly vaccinated and vetted people.” In fact the apps are subject to fraud, glitches, and haphazard use; they may provide more security theater than security. Anyway, the omicron variant is infecting everyone, vaccinated or not. But even skeptics are buying the ticket. Wrote one: “I’d rather hand over my personal info to some corporation than eat [in a restaurant] next to the unvaccinated.”

I too want to eat in a restaurant, away from the unvaccinated. But to be honest, it’s not just because I don’t want to get sick. It’s because I despise them — whoever they are — the sans-papiers. I am not proud of this.

“WE ARE GOING to be living in pandemic societies for the rest of our lives,” predicted Escoffier, the historian. “What does this mean politically?” I wondered: Can public health kill public life?

Perhaps it was inevitable that in a nation where mutuality is in splinters, isolation turned from prescription to preference. Workers reconsidered the rewards of in-person colleagueship and deemed them not worth the commute. Shopkeepers slid the credit card reader forward, recoiling from accidental touch. We all withdrew further into our screens. Human connection squeezed further into digital pathways patrolled by corporations. With the decline of casual social intercourse in public spaces we are unlearning the instincts and emotions — the very notion — of the social. Babies are starting life without ever seeing a stranger’s smile.

Omicron is leapfrogging from body to body. The virus is no doubt busily mutating. Now the corporate digital police are reinforced by agents of the biopolitical state, armed with scanners. They read our QR codes and unlock our cells. Who does not want out?

The vaccine passport embodies the contradictions of the pandemic that birthed it. It guards borders, divides us from them. It also facilitates travel, and travel is an antidote to tribalism. In either case, it is not going away. Therefore, if it is indeed the prototype linchpin of a future global, digital hyper-surveillance apparatus, we must demand that it be universally accessible, publicly owned and regulated, its workings transparent, and its uses stringently defined.

For the moment, the vaccine pass is allowing us to repopulate the third spaces and revitalize the public square, where accidental touch accustoms us to tolerance and minor conflict conditions us for democratic discourse. Technologies encode their makers’ and users’ values. This one must serve the survival of the social.



 

Russia-Ukraine conflict: Trudeau speaks after Putin launches "military o...

Posted: 24 Feb 2022 10:53 AM PST

..

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to deliver remarks and hold a media availability Thursday in response to the ongoing "military operation" by Russia taking place in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin defied international pressure and launched a wide-ranging attack on Ukraine Thursday, telling the West not to intervene in what appeared to be the beginning of a new conflict in Europe. Putin said in an early morning televised speech the “special military operation,” which he said would occur in eastern Ukraine, was in response to Ukrainian threats while insisting Russia doesn’t have a goal to occupy the country. As of mid-morning Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says Russian forces are attempting to take the Chernobyl nuclear plant. The Russian military also says it has destroyed 74 Ukrainian facilities, including 11 air bases. 

A Major Backfire - Is the Canadian Financial and Banking System in Serious Trouble as a Result of Their Attack on Private Bank Accounts?

Posted: 24 Feb 2022 10:34 AM PST

Bloggers note: This may have been anticipated to accelerate  the #WEF see #ForeignAgentsCanada in Cabinet

A Major Backfire - Is the Canadian Financial and Banking System in Serious Trouble as a Result of Their Attack on Private Bank Accounts?

 

A Major Backfire – Is the Canadian Financial and Banking System in Serious Trouble as a Result of Their Attack on Private Bank Accounts?

 | Sundance754 Comments

Has there been a massive exodus of capital out of the Canadian financial system?

A few obscure but interesting data-points seem to indicate Justin Trudeau’s unprecedented use of the federal government and intelligence apparatus to target the bank accounts of Canadian citizens has just created a serious problem for their financial institutions.

If I was a betting person, I would bet half my stake that something very serious is happening in the background of the Canadian financial system, and it appears the leaders inside government, as well as leaders in the international financial community, are reacting and trying to keep things quiet.  Stick with me on this and stay elevated…

BACKGROUND – When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he was invoking the Emergency War Measures Act to seize bank accounts and block access to the financial system for people who were arbitrarily deemed as terrorists to the interest of the Canadian government, i.e. the Freedom Protest group writ large, many people immediately thought about the consequences of a government taking such action.

Indeed, the first response to many who witnessed the gleeful declarations of the Canadian government as they expressed their intent to utilize their emergency power, was that this was seriously going to undermine faith and confidence in the Canadian financial systems. The RCMP is the Canadian equivalent of the FBI.

If the government can work with the RCMP to target people based on an arbitrary political decree, and then control your bank account while simultaneously giving financial institutions liability protection for their participation, the confidence in the banking system is immediately undermined.

What might seem like a great tool for political punishment has long term consequences, especially if people start withdrawing their money and/or shifting the placement of their investments to more secure locations away from the reach of the Canadian government.  Considering the rules of fractional banking and deposits, it doesn’t take many withdrawals before the banks have serious issues.

DATA POINTS – In addition to being Justin Trudeau’s deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland is also the Finance Minister of Canada.  Yesterday, a very twitchy, nervous and gasping for breath Freeland was noted in a very agitated state when she attended the press conference of her boss.  Factually you can watch the video and see how stressed she was and incapable of keeping herself stable [SEE HERE].

Watch that video from the perspective that someone in the international financial world, IMF, World Bank or other affiliate in the world of collective finance has just had a very serious talk with Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.

♦ Shortly after that very awkward performance, Finance Minister Freeland’s assistant deputy, Isabelle Jacques, informed a parliamentary committee that all bank accounts frozen by the federal government’s use of the Emergency Act, were immediately being unfrozen.

( VIA CBC ) – […] More than 200 bank accounts worth nearly $8 million were frozen when the federal government used emergency powers to end a massive protest occupation of downtown Ottawa.  Federal officials report most of the accounts are now in the process of being released, a parliamentary committee heard Tuesday.

Isabelle Jacques, assistant deputy minister of finance, told a committee of MPs that up to 210 bank accounts holding about $7.8 million were frozen under the financial measures contained in the Emergencies Act. (read more)

Obviously, many people realized from the outset what the Canadian government had done was tenuously legal at best, provided no legal due process or right of challenge, and likely would not pass any serious legal scrutiny.  Unfortunately, in the echo chamber that is far-left liberalism, such matters are not as important as the ideological political motives; but there are people who realize the consequences of power-lust in this application.

Without a doubt, just as you were likely stunned, amazed and then angered by the financial punishment declared by Trudeau, there are people aligned with Trudeau –outside his government– who could see a bigger picture of consequence than those inside the echo chamber.

Central banking finance ministers around the world obviously would pay close attention to what Trudeau just announced, and there are certainly people in the World Economic Forum (WEF) group, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and central bankers who would not be happy about the Canadian government showing just how easy it is to snatch money out of the hands of citizens.

These tools of citizen control are things well known to the central bankers and control agents of finance, but they are never spoken about in polite company – let alone publicized, promoted and openly bragged about.

Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland essentially broke the financial code of Omerta, by highlighting how easy it is for government to seize your bank accounts, credit cards, retirement accounts, insurance, mortgages, loan access and cut you off from money.

Worse yet, the short-sighted Canadian government via Minister Freeland announced their ability to control cryptocurrency exchanges in their country and block access within a financial mechanism that exists almost entirely as an insurance policy and hedge against the exact actions the government was taking.

♦ A very nervous Finance Minister, Chrystia Freeland, appears with Trudeau to talk about Ukraine.

♦ Freeland’s underling, Deputy Minister Jacques, is simultaneously telling parliament the bank accounts are being unfrozen.

♦ The CBC then reports that RCMP officials are taking a 180° reversal in position, about asset seizures.

Then there’s this supportive data-point from Jordan Peterson (Direct Rumble Link):

 

.

Is the Canadian government now experiencing a serious financial problem as the result of Trudeau and Freeland’s totalitarian lust for power and use of finance to crush their political opposition?

Apply Occam’s Razor here and the result is akin to: ‘How couldn’t they“.

Once that tool is deployed, there’s no putting the toothpaste back into the tube.

 


THE LAST STAND

Posted: 14 Feb 2022 09:41 PM PST

 EXTRACT from Article :

No, today it has taken on a much more powerful and insidious form through technology by The Great Corralling of humanity into an infrastructure whereby our movement, banking, purchasing, and health care are all digitally fused together. We are only a short step away from the currency becoming digitized — which has already begun in China and soon, India.[9]

It used to be that if an activist were going to go participate in something and the Chinese Communist Party wanted to prevent them from leaving or prevent them from partaking in something, they would send a bunch of thugs to go and prevent them from going. But now, what they can do is on a computer, they can change the status — vaccination status or other health information — to make it so they can’t even buy a plane ticket or a train ticket to go somewhere. —Chen Guangcheng, Ibid.

Once this is tied to your vaccine passport, your ability to buy and sell, ie. access to your bank account, enter businesses and so forth will depend on whether you are fully “vaxxed” or not. It’s already happening! I can’t sit down for a cup of coffee in my local town, even though I’ve had COVID, am healthy, and fully immune. This is segregation! This is discrimination! This is immoral!

I can’t say it more forcefully enough, this is literaly the end of human liberty in the West if this plan [for vaccine passports] unfolds as planned. —Dr. Naomi Wolfe, Following the Science?, 59:04



 

The Last Stand

Posted on  by 

The Mallett Clan riding for freedom…

 

We cannot let freedom die with this generation.
—Army Major Stephen Chledowski, Canadian soldier; February 11th, 2022

We are approaching the final hours…
Our future is quite literally, freedom or tyranny…
—Robert G., a concerned Canadian (from Telegram)

Would that all men would judge of the tree by its fruit,
and would acknowledge the seed and origin of the evils which press upon us,
and of the dangers that are impending!
We have to deal with a deceitful and crafty enemy, who,
gratifying the ears of people and of princes,
has ensnared them by smooth speeches and by adulation. 
—POPE LEO XIII, Humanus Genusn. 28

 

IT has been an emotional roller-coaster this week for citizens across the world who, after two years of repeated falsehoodsdemonstrably flawed science,[1] and experimentation on their bodies, have risen up against their governments. Ironically, Canada — the one country most known for its passiveness and proclivity for political correctness — is leading the charge against the medical tyranny being imposed on their citizens. And governments have done everything in their power to vilify these people as “hateful”, “violent”, “racist”, etc..[2] But thousands of videos and testimonies from eyewitnesses have debunked the accusations of CBC and the rest of the establishment media that have attempted to demonize the entire movement by the behavior of literally a few individuals.[3] In France, the same tactic is being rolled out by its government:

This is not the Freedom Convoy. It is the convoy of shame and selfishness. These are not patriots but people who are irresponsible. It is paradoxical to claim to be in favor of freedom when the idea is to block people’s lives. —Clément Beaune, French state secretary for European Affairs; twitter.com

What a paradox that the very governments that enacted unprecedented and immoral lockdowns,[4] banned children from playing together and pursuing their dreams, destroyed countless businesses and lives and bitterly divided communities — for a virus with a survival rate now in line with the flu…[5] are preaching about freedom. The hypocrisy and callousness is breathtaking. And “the science” stands squarely on the side of the protesters.

…lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument. —John Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, “A Literature Review and Meta-Anlaysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality”, Herby, Jonung and Hanke; January 2022, sites.krieger.jhu.edu

The Canadian “lockdown” response will kill at least 10 times more than it might have saved from the actual virus, COVID-19. The unconscionable use of fear during an emergency, to ensure compliance, has caused a breach in confidence in government that will last a decade or more. The damage to our democracy will last at least a generation. —David Redman, M.Eng., July 2021, page 5, “Canada’s Deadly Response to COVID-19”

Make no mistake: if your government is telling you that, in order to participate in society, you must henceforth take whatever drug cocktail they have purchased from mega pharmaceutical corporations — you are living in tyranny.

No pope, no bishop, no politician, no medical official, no dictator, and certainly no family member, has the right to force, guilt, or shame an injection into your body. Ever.

…the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. —Nuremberg Code; Shuster E. Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg codeNew England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337:1436-1440

…vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary. — “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines”, n. 6; vatican.va

Research or experimentation on the human being cannot legitimate acts that are in themselves contrary to the dignity of persons and to the moral law. Experimentation on human beings is not morally legitimate if it exposes the subject’s life or physical and psychological integrity to disproportionate or avoidable risks. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2295

Even if it is couched in the words that it is an “act of love”, it cannot be forced. We have a word for an act of love that is forced: rape. You are in denial if you believe that, for the rest of your life, endless boosters and injections are “for the common good.” This is a lie, and if you believe it, you need to pray and fast to be untangled from this “mass formation psychosis”[6] — especially when the short-term data reveals that such injections are unquestionably devastating for not a few[7] and the long-term effects for all are still unknown (though the late Nobel laureate, Dr. Luc Montagnier, has something to say about that here). In other words, if you weren’t harmed thus far, to deliberately ignore the devastation this has wrought on millions is not an act of love but truly “selfish”.[8]

 

The New Totalitarianism

We must get it out of our minds that jackboots and tanks rolling up and down our streets are the only “true” totalitarianism.

A Chinese Communist-style social credit system is “happening at our doorsteps now in the United States and in Europe.” —Chen Guangcheng, human rights lawyer and Chinese dissident; February 11th, 2022, lifesitenews.com

No, today it has taken on a much more powerful and insidious form through technology by The Great Corralling of humanity into an infrastructure whereby our movement, banking, purchasing, and health care are all digitally fused together. We are only a short step away from the currency becoming digitized — which has already begun in China and soon, India.[9]

It used to be that if an activist were going to go participate in something and the Chinese Communist Party wanted to prevent them from leaving or prevent them from partaking in something, they would send a bunch of thugs to go and prevent them from going. But now, what they can do is on a computer, they can change the status — vaccination status or other health information — to make it so they can’t even buy a plane ticket or a train ticket to go somewhere. —Chen Guangcheng, Ibid.

Once this is tied to your vaccine passport, your ability to buy and sell, ie. access to your bank account, enter businesses and so forth will depend on whether you are fully “vaxxed” or not. It’s already happening! I can’t sit down for a cup of coffee in my local town, even though I’ve had COVID, am healthy, and fully immune. This is segregation! This is discrimination! This is immoral!

I can’t say it more forcefully enough, this is literaly the end of human liberty in the West if this plan [for vaccine passports] unfolds as planned. —Dr. Naomi Wolfe, Following the Science?, 59:04

And God forgive our bishops for their incomprehensible silence, if not complicity, while these mounting injustices have taken place beneath their eyes.[10] At last, a Vatican correspondent has broken ranks with the silence of the majority of the Catholic media and spoken the truth: 

Church leaders, beginning with Pope Francis and the Vatican, have been silent and complicit in the face of grave wrongs committed over the past two years… In the case of the Vatican, it has committed these injustices on its own territory, enforcing some of the world’s strictest vaccine mandates even when evidence mounts that these shots pose considerable health risks, especially for young people, and the threat of the virus, once serious according to scientific modelling, recedes.

Having long washed its hands of any concern over the jabs being abortion-tainted, the Vatican unquestioningly went along with the powers-that-be followed by most of the world’s bishops. That might have been understandable at first but this position did not change.

Never mind the gross injustices, unnecessary hardships, and suffering caused to millions by the madness of lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

The Church’s leaders remained silent on the policies, but not before becoming complicit: committing injustices against the souls of their flocks by closing churches for long periods, enforcing restrictions on worship, banning the unvaccinated from the sacraments in some cases, and most recently backing grossly unjust, state-sanctioned vaccine mandates.

The sheep felt abandoned by their shepherds as their bishops fixed their gaze on physical health and mass groupthink rather than the eternal well-being of souls and common sense — a this-worldly orientation that has been in the making for decades but which came of age during COVID.

History will not look kindly on the leaders of the Church during this period, even less so if they remain silent and complicit as more details of unjust and dishonest public health policies of the past two years continue to emerge. —Edward Pentin, “The Deafening Silence and Grievous Complicity of Church Leaders During Covid”, February 5th, 2022

Indeed, as Fr. Alfred Delp, S.J. wrote before the Nazi’s executed him:

At some future date the honest historian will have some bitter things to say about the contribution of the Churches to the creation of the mass mind, of collectivism, dictatorships and so on. —Fr. Alfred Delp, SJ, Prison Writings (Orbis Books), pp. xxxi-xxxii 

This is the last stand for freedom in the West. If Western leaders prevail and crush the freedom movement and succeed with their mandates and passports, liberty will be gone — for the “vaxxed” and “unvaxxed” alike. And then, we will literally be living the words of St. John:

…all nations were led astray by your sorcery. (Rev 18:23; the Greek word for sorcery is φαρμακείᾳ (pharmakeia) — “the use of medicine, drugs or spells.”)

The attempts by politicians to smear the characters of the hundreds of millions of Canadians, French, Australians, Russians, and others who have risen up against this global takeover is disgusting and reprehensible — and time will prove that those who opposed them were on the wrong side of both history and science.[11] Today, three top Canadian doctors and scientists arranged a meeting with Canadian health officials to discuss the data of the current mass vaccination.[12] But the health officials didn’t show up. Why? The answer is obvious. The data completely upends their careful, brilliant, but failed narrative.[13]

 

Revolution in the Church

In the meantime, another battle is taking place within the Church herself  — an equally diabolical revolution. Just as the pandemic has completely turned the scientific-medical paradigm upside down…

The post-Covid pseudo-medical order has not only destroyed the medical paradigm I faithfully practised as a medical doctor last year… it has inverted it. I do not recognize the government apocalypse in my medical reality. The breath-taking speed and ruthless efficiency with which the media-industrial complex have co-opted our medical wisdom, democracy and government to usher in this new medical order is a revolutionary act. —an anonymous U.K. physician known as “The Covid Physician”

…so too, apostate prelates, clearly in contradiction of Catholic teaching, are attempting to destroy the moral foundations of the Church. Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich of Luxembourg, the relator general of the unfolding Synod on Synodality, has outright stated that the Church’s teaching on homosexuality “is false” and that its teaching on human sexuality that is ordered toward conjugal love between husband and wife, an image of Trinitarian life — is fundamentally flawed.[14] Here, we are seeing the prophetic warning of Pope Leo XIII finally reaching its fulfillment in our times: the attempted overthrow of both the social and Christian order:

Now, the masonic sect produces fruits that are pernicious and of the bitterest savour. For, from what We have above most clearly shown, that which is their ultimate purpose forces itself into view — namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, of which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere naturalism. —Humanum GenusApril 20th, 1884; n. 10

You are alive, born for these times, to witness what St. John Paul II called “the final confrontation” of this era. And as usual, God has raised up the anawim, the little ones, the obscure to raise the battle cry. Truckers. Farmers. Commoners. You and me — Our Lady’s Little Rabble

It is the last stand. It is the hour for us to prepare to give our lives for the sake of the Gospel, for the sake of truth. What an honor and privilege to give everything to Jesus, who gave everything for us. 

There are values which must never be abandoned for a greater value and even surpass the preservation of physical life. There is martyrdom. God is (about) more than mere physical survival. A life that would be bought by the denial of God, a life that is based on a final lie, is a non-life. Martyrdom is a basic category of Christian existence. The fact that martyrdom is no longer morally necessary in the theory advocated by Böckle and many others shows that the very essence of Christianity is at stake here… Today’s Church is more than ever a “Church of the Martyrs” and thus a witness to the living God. —EMERITUS POPE BENEDICT XVI, Essay: ‘The Church and the scandal of sexual abuse’; Catholic News AgencyApril 10th, 2019

This is no time to be ashamed of the Gospel. It is the time to preach it from the rooftops. —POPE SAINT JOHN PAUL II, Homily, Cherry Creek State Park Homily, Denver, Colorado, August 15th, 1993; vatican.va

 

Major Stephen Chledowski breaks ranks with a powerful statement:


February 11th, 2022

 



 



Now on Telegram. Click:

Follow Mark and the daily “signs of the times” on MeWe:


Follow Mark’s writings here:




 

 

Footnotes
Footnotes
↑1see Following the Science?Top 10 Pandemic FablesOpen Letter to the Catholic Bishops and Unmasking the Facts
↑2cf. Trudeau is Wrong, Dead Wrong
↑3Canadian convoy spokesman rejects government attempts to provoke violence: see rumble.com
↑4cf. When I was Hungry
↑5World-renowned bio-statistician and epidemiologist, Prof. John Iannodis of Standford University, published a paper on the infection fatality rate of COVID-19. Here are the age-stratified statistics:

0-19: .0027% (or a survival rate of 99.9973%)
20-29 .014% (or a survival rate of 99.986%)
30-39 .031% (or a survival rate of 99.969%)
40-49 .082% (or a survival rate of 99.918%)
50-59 .27% (or a survival rate of 99.73%)
60-69 .59% (or a survival rate of 99.31%) (Source: medrxiv.org)

…far lower than originally feared and no different to severe flu. —Dr. Eshani M King, November 13th, 2020; bmj.com

↑6cf. The Strong Delusion and Mass Psychosis and Totalitarianism
↑7cf. The Tolls
↑8cf. The Tolls; read their stories here and here.
↑9bbc.comcnbc.com
↑10Dear Shepherds… Where Are YouOpen Letter to the Catholic Bishops
↑11Trudeau is Wrong, Dead Wrong
↑12Watch: rumble.com
↑13Trudeau is Wrong, Dead WrongTop Ten Pandemic Fables
↑14ncregister.com

 

Mesures d'urgence

Posted: 14 Feb 2022 09:27 PM PST

.

 

 

0:00

bonjour à tous mon nom est françois
00:02
chartrand et nous sommes présentement le
00:04
13 février 2022 je vous parlais du
00:07
québec pour ceux qui voulaient savoir si
00:09
j'étais revenu au pays oui je suis au
00:12
québec ce pays qui est en difficulté
00:14
présentement parce que
00:17
selon toute évidence
00:19
les mesures d'urgence vont être adoptées
00:22
au québec
00:24
la suite de l'annoncé en ontario du
00:27
premier ministre qui a déclaré les
00:30
mesures d'urgence
00:32
les mesures d'urgence en fait c'est la
00:35
loi martiale c'est à dire que les droits
00:38
civils sont suspendues
00:40
temporairement pendant pendant qu'on
00:42
règle cette crise donc ça veut dire que
00:46
là les forces de l'ordre ont une
00:49
autorité qu'il n'avait pas en temps
00:52
normal ils ont maintenant énormément de
00:55
de latitude pour agir pour faire face à
00:59
cette crise n'est
01:01
leur nombre peut être également augmenté
01:04
on peut nommer de nouveaux officiers il
01:06
ya plein de choses qu'on peut faire par
01:08
la loi martiale qu'on ne peut pas faire
01:09
un temps normal maintenant lorsqu'on
01:12
invoque la loi martiale pour faire face
01:14
à une crise
01:18
légitimité dépend de
01:21
ce qu'on entend par la crise quelle est
01:24
la cause de cette crise et quelles sont
01:27
les méthodes et quels sont les
01:28
justifications
01:29
et c'est là que ça devient très
01:34
très ambigu parce que
01:37
la crise aurait été causée selon ce que
01:42
nous dit
01:44
le premier ministre de l'ontario
01:47
ça aurait été causé par le convoi de la
01:50
liberté qui a été initiée par les
01:53
camionneurs et qui maintenant a obtenu
01:54
le soutien d'un large segment de la
01:56
population
01:57
donc est ce que c'est vraiment ça qui
02:01
est la cause de l'urgence et
02:03
est-ce que c'est légitime en fait de
02:06
déclarer cet état d'urgence maintenant
02:09
je pense que ceux qui m'écoutent est
02:11
depuis un bout de temps et ceux qui
02:13
portaient attention attentivement aux
02:16
événements on voit bien qu'il ya une
02:17
diversion magistral qui est orchestrée
02:20
par ce que la crise a été causée par des
02:24
facteurs qui
02:26
ont été dénoncés en fait par le convoi
02:29
de la liberté
02:30
et donc tous ses pouvoirs accrus de des
02:35
forces de l'ordre et quand on parle de
02:37
loi martiale évidemment martial ça vient
02:40
de ses militaires sauf que
02:42
cela ne concerne pas seulement les
02:45
militaires mais également tous les
02:46
forces de l'ordre qui ont maintenant des
02:48
pouvoirs extraordinaires pour agir par
02:52
contre on til le mobile de le faire dans
02:56
l'est dans le contexte où cet état
03:00
d'urgence aurait été déclarée avec des
03:03
dés des justifications qui sont
03:06
fallacieuses qui sont fausses et qui ne
03:09
sont pas basées sur les faits sur la
03:11
réalité donc là il ya un grosse remise
03:15
en question qui est nécessaire pour tous
03:17
ceux qui sont impliqués pour nous tous
03:18
en fête pour savoir comment se comporter
03:21
devant ça
03:23
il y a y a des
03:26
il ya des gens qui me disent bon écoute
03:30
semble pas avoir saisi que ce mouvement
03:34
des camionneurs a été initiée par les
03:37
wildcats
03:39
les wildcats en français les chapeaux
03:41
blancs je pense que tout le monde
03:42
connaît le terme maintenant c'est jdd
03:45
bongolo t qui
03:47
oeuvrent pour le bien de l'humanité
03:50
et qui seraient dans l'âme arrière-plan
03:54
nos en train d'orchestrer des événements
03:56
pour renverser la tyrannie qui est qui
04:00
est maintenant globale
04:01
et donc il y à ce mouvement 2
04:06
des classifications des informations
04:09
clés permettant d'inculper les coupables
04:12
et de re de ramener la justice donc on a
04:16
les bons d'un côté les mauvais de
04:17
l'autre et malheureusement je pense que
04:20
si on regarde la situation avec ce point
04:22
de vue on ne pourra pas comprendre les
04:25
différents scénarios qui sont possibles
04:27
premièrement mais
04:29
il faut le dire dans
04:32
les white hat si on parle ici des
04:35
services de renseignement militaire de
04:37
l'armée américaine qui ont entrepris de
04:41
divulgation d'informations stratégiques
04:45
chez les civils à travers différentes
04:49
méthodes
04:50
mais d'une façon cryptic pourquoi tout
04:54
ce secret pourquoi se cache-t-il et bien
04:56
là c'est une grande question une très
04:59
très grande question
05:00
premièrement je n'ai aucune raison de
05:04
penser que le mouvement n'est pas été
05:07
spontanément initiée par les camionneurs
05:10
quoi que c'est possible et même probable
05:12
qu' il y a qu'il y ait une implication
05:16
des militaires dans cette
05:19
dans ce mouvement mais le mouvement
05:20
n'aurait jamais été possible si les
05:23
caméras au départ n'était pas volontaire
05:25
pour le faire donc il peut y avoir une
05:28
influence mais de là à dire que c'est
05:29
piloté par
05:31
évidemment il ya le timing là on qui est
05:34
extrêmement
05:36
intrigant donc je conçois la possibilité
05:39
qu'il puisse y avoir la main des
05:42
militaires derrière ça mais le problème
05:44
voyez vous c'est que tout ça est non
05:46
officiels et la population n'en est pas
05:50
informée
05:50
maintenant pourquoi les militaires si
05:54
c'est le corps qui sont derrière
05:56
beaucoup de d'événements à l'heure
05:58
actuelle pourquoi garde-t-il de silence
06:01
par rapport à la population est pourquoi
06:03
tout ce secret je pense que c'est une
06:05
question très importante il faut
06:08
explorer cette question
06:11
évidemment lorsque vous avez par exemple
06:14
une enquête policière les gens les
06:16
policiers vont vous dire va écouter
06:18
puisqu'il ya une enquête en cours on ne
06:21
peut pas vous divulguer d'informations
06:22
sans risquer de compromettre
06:25
l'anc est donc évidemment le travail des
06:27
policiers dans ce cas là doit être
06:29
protégé par le secret pour ne pas
06:33
déranger les évidences pour
06:36
n'a pas alerté par exemple les
06:40
les suspects et pour mapa aussi
06:43
influencer les témoins et tout ça il ya
06:45
toutes sortes de raisons pour ne pas que
06:47
les preuves disparaissent que les gens
06:49
fassent les coupables phase de faire
06:51
disparaître les preuves lorsqu'ils sont
06:53
informés qu'il ya une enquête donc tous
06:56
ces raisons sont valables par contre on
06:59
peut voir que souvent il peut y avoir un
07:02
dérapage et c'est à dire que la la
07:05
les forces de l'ordre agissant sous le
07:07
couvert du secret peuvent en arriver à
07:10
allé beaucoup trop loin dans le maintien
07:13
de cette enquête et qui fait que yann
07:16
une promiscuité est là qui s'établit
07:18
c'est à dire la proximité avec les les
07:23
suspects et le fait de composantes et de
07:27
les piéger pour
07:29
pouvoir accumuler des preuves parfois il
07:32
faut induire les suspects en erreur
07:35
c'est à dire les amener à se
07:37
compromettre de façon à ce qu'on ait des
07:39
preuves sur eux mais en ce faisant on
07:41
peut attendre de les piéger on devient
07:44
aussi complet c'est à dire qu'il faut
07:47
une forme d'un niveau un certain niveau
07:50
de coopération avec les coupables pour
07:54
arriver à allait compromettre et les
07:57
mettre dans une position on aura les
07:58
preuves et bien et évidemment si on a
08:01
affaire à des gens qui ne sont pas
08:03
suffisamment courageux à cette force de
08:06
caractère et qui se laisse emporter dans
08:09
ce mouvement du secret et de cette
08:11
complicité avec les coupables à un
08:14
moment donné ils deviennent complices
08:17
comme je le dis donc ils
08:18
ont mis en place une situation où des
08:23
crimes vont être commis qui n'auraient
08:24
pas été commises sans leur intervention
08:26
c'est à dire qu'on a on a aidé à
08:29
commettre des crimes soit disant pour
08:31
être capable d'accumuler les brevets de
08:34
de capturer les coupables de les prendre
08:37
sur le fait donc
08:41
c'est il faut le dire
08:45
les white hats
08:47
le casque blanc est tachée de sang
08:50
depuis longtemps l'armée américaine a
08:52
commis des atrocités dans le monde
08:54
entier
08:55
et de très très graves crimes ont été
08:59
commis et puis là on est supposé obtenir
09:03
la justice parce que c'est ça le
09:06
problème il ya les tribunaux muhly
09:07
militaires qui doivent imposer la
09:10
justice
09:12
lorsque
09:13
l'état civil a failli à cette tâche et
09:16
que les conséquences sont irréversibles
09:20
et qu'on ne peut plus espérer retourner
09:23
à l'ordre là il ya des mesures d'urgence
09:26
qui doivent être prises les tribunaux
09:28
militaires les militaires doivent
09:29
s'assurer de métier d'un minimum de
09:32
cohésion sociale et donc ils doivent
09:36
entrer en action avec un des pouvoirs
09:38
accrus et avec en enlevant toute l'airé
09:42
street pour qu'ils puissent être très
09:43
efficace
09:45
mais est ce que est ce qu'ils sont
09:48
entières et est-ce qu'ils sont blancs
09:49
comme neige est-ce qu'on peut
09:51
entièrement leur faire confiance
09:53
eh bien je moi je pense que absolument
09:56
pas on ne peut pas se dire que ils vont
10:00
régler tous les problèmes à notre place
10:01
et que nous avons simplement à observer
10:05
le spectacle comme s'il s'agissait d'une
10:06
pièce de théâtre
10:08
ou du cinéma en fait il s'agit de la vie
10:12
des gens qui est dans la balance ici qui
10:16
est concerné et puis le fait que nous
10:20
sommes en état de guerre en fait c'est
10:23
ce que ça veut dire l'état d'urgence et
10:25
c
10:27
c'est un synonyme de d'état de guerre
10:30
c'est en ce sens que les mesures qui
10:33
doivent être prises sont aussi extrêmes
10:36
et aussi urgente que lorsqu'on est en
10:40
guerre et qui l ennemi c ça peut être
10:44
très difficile à déterminer mais on sait
10:46
qu'on ne peut plus attendre avant d'agir
10:48
et donc là nous pour le retour à l'autre
10:52
il faudrait qu'on peut savoir ce qui
10:55
s'est vraiment passé
10:56
maintenant il ya les attentats
10:59
terroristes du 11 septembre 2001 à new
11:02
york
11:03
nine - luan
11:05
qui est un moment qui a marqué
11:07
l'aggravation marquée des des
11:11
interventions militaires notamment en
11:13
irak on a eu ans la libye l'afghanistan
11:17
le yémen la syrie a est différente aux
11:21
endroits où les les justifications pour
11:25
ses manoeuvres militaires était qu' il y
11:30
avait eu un attentat terroriste à new
11:31
york
11:32
maintenant les les médiums nous on porte
11:37
clairement nous ont pas efficacement
11:40
informer sur les conséquences de ces
11:42
opérations militaires au moyen orient
11:44
mais la réalité était incontournable les
11:48
indéniables les faits sont là sont
11:50
observables il ya eu des millions et des
11:52
millions de morts dans la population
11:54
civile dans ces pays
11:57
et on n'a pas trouvé là les
12:03
la justification qui avait été donnée
12:05
n'est plus crédible présentement donc il
12:08
s'agit de crimes de guerre et qui est où
12:11
étaient les white hats
12:13
où étaient des bongo à ce moment là bas
12:18
il était en place et ils ont participé
12:19
donc ils sont coupables de crimes de
12:21
guerre
12:22
alors c'est pour ça que
12:25
lorsqu'ils nous disent maintenant nous
12:28
prenons la situation en main
12:31
ils doivent
12:33
savoir que il est beaucoup trop tard
12:36
pour se réclamer d'être parfaitement
12:40
innocent dans cette histoire
12:42
et s'ils nous disent mais on nous avons
12:46
été induits en erreur très bien mais
12:49
maintenant vous induisent et le peuple
12:50
en erreur en ne les informant pas parce
12:53
que vous voyez on n'a pas besoin d'aller
12:55
à la convention de genève on a
12:57
simplement à u faire usage de notre
13:00
jugement le bon sens nous dit que s'il y
13:05
a vraiment un état d'urgence aussi grave
13:07
les gens ont le droit de prendre des
13:10
mesures pour se protéger pour
13:12
s'entraider pour se soutenir
13:14
mutuellement
13:15
et d'ailleurs c'est très clairement dit
13:17
dans la convention de genève que il
13:20
c'est un crime de guerre d'empêcher les
13:22
gens de s'entraider
13:24
de
13:26
d'empêcher des gens de recevoir par
13:28
exemple une aide un soutien matériel ou
13:30
même une aide spirituelle le savoir qu'
13:34
on est on est pas seul ça peut faire
13:36
toute la différence dans une situation
13:38
tragique donc d'empêcher les gens de se
13:41
rassembler de coopérer de s'offrir deux
13:44
du soutien matin matériel comme jeu
13:46
comme je disais tout ça ce sont des
13:48
crimes de guerre les civils ont le droit
13:50
de s'organiser de et d essayer de faire
13:54
tout ce qui est en leur pouvoir pour
13:56
améliorer leur sort et on ne peut pas
13:58
juste attendre que les militaires
14:01
agissent comme des sauveurs qui vient de
14:02
le sortir de là c'est complètement
14:05
illogique
14:06
donc lorsque on se retrouve dans une
14:09
situation où on à
14:11
ses partenaires de l'état d'urgence par
14:14
rapport à quoi et les mesures de guerre
14:16
par rapport à quoi et qui fait quoi au
14:19
juste la population a le droit de savoir
14:21
moi lorsqu'on me dit ben là il ya des
14:25
opérations militaires et on ne peut pas
14:26
dévoiler ce qui se passe en réalité
14:30
vous priver les civils la population
14:35
des du minimum vital pour qu'ils
14:37
puissent comprendre ce qu'ils ont à
14:39
faire et plus équipe pour qu'ils
14:42
puissent s'organiser
14:43
les militaires peuvent s'imaginer que ce
14:47
serait ce serait trop tôt pour informer
14:50
les gens
14:52
parce que ça pourrait causer de panique
14:54
ben c'est pas vous d'en juger les
14:56
militaires ce que les ce que les civils
14:59
ont le droit de savoir ou non lorsque
15:02
leur vie est menacée lorsque c'est leur
15:04
destin qui est concerné ils ont le droit
15:07
de savoir et si vous n'avez pas
15:08
confiance dans leur réaction devant les
15:11
faits qui pourraient être les troubles
15:13
et au point tel que ça pourrait aggraver
15:15
le problème
15:16
mais à ce moment là on peut se demander
15:18
si on peut avoir confiance en vous qui
15:20
avez gardé le secret trop longtemps
15:23
et donc les limiteurs ont un énorme
15:26
problème de relations publiques
15:29
s'ils veulent maintenir
15:31
leurs co la coopération avec les civils
15:35
parce que vous savez les civils
15:38
dans tout ça lorsqu'ils deviennent
15:41
hostile
15:43
c'est vraiment vraiment mauvaise
15:46
situation pour pour les soldats voilà on
15:50
a un exemple de ce qui se produit
15:51
lorsque les gens ne sont pas informés
15:53
dans ce vide on comble levée de l'élite
15:57
les gens qui sont responsables d'avoir
16:01
forcé la population à de
16:04
se conformer à des mesures tout à fait
16:08
déraisonnables qui ont causé énormément
16:10
de temps et qui ne peuvent pas avoué
16:12
façon crédible
16:14
les erreurs qu'ils ont commis par ce que
16:17
il était en possession de l'information
16:22
qui les combattent
16:24
les autorités qui ont forcé les
16:27
populations depuis deux ans à
16:29
restreindre leurs activités de toutes
16:32
sortes
16:33
ne peuvent pas plaider l'ignorance à ce
16:37
moment ci et donc qu'ils sont en état de
16:40
panique lorsque tout est en train de
16:41
sortir au grand jour et qui montre que
16:45
c'était vraiment
16:47
défaillance de leurs devoirs civile de
16:50
voir plus fondamental un gouvernement
16:53
qui ne peut pas protéger les citoyens
16:55
n'a pas raison d'être c'est le premier
16:57
le premier devoir le plus important
17:00
c'est d'offrir la sécurité et lorsque la
17:03
menace vient d'eux bah ils sont dans ils
17:06
sont placés dans une situation où
17:09
ils n'ont pas d'avenir et ça leur fait
17:13
peur et là on le voit très bien avec la
17:16
façon dont ils réagissent et donc donc
17:19
la fameuse état d'urgence aurait été
17:22
causé par un mouvement pacifique qui de
17:24
gens concernés qui en la science de leur
17:27
côté de plus en plus de la science c'est
17:30
clair on a invoqué la science depuis le
17:33
début mais la science ce n'est pas si
17:36
facile gaza à manipuler les faits sont
17:40
là les sciences fait qu'il ya beaucoup
17:41
de gens dans ce milieu là qui ont une
17:44
conscience professionnelle qui fait qu'
17:47
ils n'ont ils ont refusé de
17:50
nourrir la propagande est de plus en
17:53
plus la science est en train de donner
17:55
raison à tous ceux qui disent faut que
17:57
ça cesse maintenant
17:58
et là les camionneurs et et tous les
18:03
gens qui les soutiennent
18:04
ont sont déterminés à
18:08
restés sur place jusqu'à ce qu'ils
18:10
obtiennent du gouvernement ce qu'ils
18:12
veulent maintenant si l'état d'urgence
18:14
est déclaré ce n'est plus le
18:16
gouvernement civil qui décide là on a un
18:19
nouveau un nouveau système de
18:21
commandement pour dans les cas d'urgence
18:24
ce sont les militaires qui doivent qui
18:28
doivent intervenir ça fait longtemps que
18:30
le réseau d'information au civil qui a
18:33
des informateurs du côté des militaires
18:35
et qui l'information circulée nuit nous
18:38
annonce qu'il va y avoir le ebe est
18:41
emergency broadcast system le système de
18:45
transmission d'urgence pour que la
18:49
population en entier
18:51
d'un coup sec soit informé de ce qui
18:54
s'est vraiment passé et là il faut
18:57
remonter loin en arrière pour exonérer
18:59
les
19:01
les militaires qui ont maintenant
19:04
l'autorité mais qui ne sont pas
19:06
complètement innocent à moins qu'il nous
19:10
dévoile
19:11
exactement quelles sont les
19:13
justifications pour qu'ils aient pu
19:15
commettre des crimes aussi graves hélas
19:17
ce moment parce que lille les crimes
19:19
sont incontournables il ya eu des crimes
19:21
de guerre commis par ceux qui
19:22
présentement nous offre qui nous offre
19:25
d'imposer la justice présentement et
19:28
donc jusqu'à où il faut remonter avant
19:31
de comprendre que il avait été induit en
19:34
erreur et qui qui les a induit en erreur
19:36
bon là évidemment on sait qui a induit
19:40
les militaires en erreur qui les ont
19:43
amenés à commettre des gestes
19:45
inacceptables mais on peut leur donner
19:49
le bénéfice du doute en disant oui mais
19:51
il y avait de mauvaises informations il
19:53
y avait il y avait de la manipulation de
19:56
très haut niveau qui les a apportés agir
19:58
de façon contraire à leur mandat et ce
20:01
qui fait que ça les innocentes si on si
20:03
on ment les évidences les preuves qu'ils
20:07
ont été induits en erreur mais c'est ça
20:10
les tire la gueule à la crédulité là ce
20:12
moment s'il parce que on est toujours
20:15
dans l'ombre et les mails et les civils
20:17
sont toujours incapables de s'orienter
20:20
et savoir ce qui s'est vraiment passé né
20:22
en qui on peut faire confiance
20:24
présentement donc à chaque jour qui
20:27
passe c'est que les suivistes sont
20:30
maintenus dans l'ombre par rapport aux
20:32
opérations militaires qui soi-disant
20:34
serait en cours présentement
20:39
dans en arrière-plan il augmente de plus
20:43
en plus leurs leur complicité dans cette
20:47
dans cette manoeuvre regarder les gens
20:50
dans l'ombre et les priver de ce qu'ils
20:52
auraient besoin de savoir pour pouvoir
20:54
prendre les mesures nécessaires pour
20:57
leurs preuves dans leur propre intérêt
20:59
donc on le dit que le système de
21:01
transmission d'urgence va être bientôt
21:03
active et ça fait longtemps qu'on nous
21:05
l'annoncent et on est aujourd'hui le 13
21:08
février on est toujours dans la tente de
21:10
ce fameux dévoilement de la part des
21:14
militaires moi je pense probablement ils
21:17
sont coincés et que c'est difficile pour
21:19
eux de
21:21
2,5 hulpe et eux-mêmes en expliquant
21:25
ouvertement aux gens qu'ils ont été
21:28
complices dans des crimes de guerre
21:30
extrêmement grave et est-ce qu'ils ont
21:34
cette crédibilité pour dire ben voici
21:37
nous nous faisons amende honorable
21:39
maintenant et nous vous disons les faits
21:41
tels qu elle alors qu'eux ils craignent
21:45
la population la réaction de la
21:47
population à leur égard il faudra du
21:50
courage je parle aux militaires non
21:53
j'ai l'impression qu'ils ont la trouille
21:55
présentement mais c'est pas c'est pas
21:57
comme ça que qu'on pourra restaurer la
22:00
confiance il faudra du courage il faudra
22:03
maintenant accepter sa part du blanc m'a
22:07
arrêté de jouer des gens qui sont pures
22:09
comme blancs comme neige ils ne le sont
22:13
pas et les white hats ne sont pas
22:16
dépourvus de toute responsabilité dans
22:19
le fait que encore à cette heure tardive
22:22
nous sommes maintenus dans l'ombre par
22:24
rapport à ce qui s'est vraiment passé à
22:26
un point tel que ce sont maintenant les
22:28
camionneurs qui sont
22:29
qui l'ont accusé de toutes sortes de
22:32
choses injustes donc ça reste à voir
22:36
qu'est-ce qu'est ce qu'ils vont faire
22:37
pour se
22:39
[Musique]
22:40
repositionner d'une façon conviviale que
22:44
les gens puissent voir que il sait de
22:46
quel côté ils sont vraiment ce qu'est ce
22:48
qu'ils allaient protéger le peuple ou
22:49
non mais protéger le peuple malgré lui
22:51
c'est si ridicule le peuple n'est pas
22:55
insignifiant ce ne sont pas deux ne sont
22:57
pas du bétail
22:58
nous avons besoin savoir nous avons le
23:00
droit de savoir ce qui s'est vraiment
23:02
passé
23:03
le problème c'est qu'il faut remonter
23:05
loin en arrière
23:07
pour même dès le début de la
23:10
colonisation il ya eu les atrocités qui
23:13
ont été commis sur le territoire ici
23:15
vis-à-vis les les autochtones qui ont
23:17
été traités d'une façon très inhumaines
23:19
très cruel et tout ça m'a jamais été
23:23
réformés n'a jamais été corrigés et
23:25
encore aujourd'hui les autochtones
23:28
subisse un sort extrêmement cruelle il
23:31
ya beaucoup de gens qui ne comprennent
23:34
pas du tout la situation des autochtones
23:35
ils nous disent
23:37
les gens souvent vont dire à écouter ça
23:40
fait longtemps notent tout ça c'est
23:42
terminé puis continue de jouer voilà
23:44
victime et on leur donne de l'argent
23:47
mais refuse de se prendre en main et ça
23:50
c'est un point de vue très basée sur
23:53
l'ignorance
23:54
ce que les autochtones ont subi les a
23:58
marqués est ce qu'ils ont besoin
24:00
avant toute chose c'est de guérison et
24:03
donc il faut que soit mis à jour la
24:07
véritable histoire ce qui s'est vraiment
24:09
passé c'est depuis le début de la
24:11
colonisation que par exemple les enfants
24:14
autochtones disparaissent
24:16
ça fait depuis le début de la
24:18
colonisation qu'ils subissent du de
24:22
l'intimidation du terrorisme les gens se
24:26
disent mais il ya des gens qui pose la
24:28
question mais pourquoi pourquoi est-ce
24:29
que leurs dirigeants sont complices dans
24:31
cette affaire là mais tout simplement
24:33
parce qu'ils sont terrifiés
24:35
les concurrents
24:37
sont capables de vraiment faire très
24:41
peur lorsqu'ils ont une suprématie
24:43
militaire les puissances coloniales et
24:47
avait un pouvoir tout à fait inégale et
24:50
qu'ils ont utilisés avec eux avec grande
24:52
force et il ya eu beaucoup beaucoup
24:54
d'abus qui ont été commis et il ya eu
24:56
une accumulation à travers le temps qui
24:58
fait qu'aujourd'hui ces communautés ces
25:02
peuples autochtones sont sont
25:05
neutralisés ils sont paralysés et il
25:08
essaie de voir comment s'en sortir mais
25:10
c'est extrêmement difficile si on prend
25:12
par exemple l'histoire des juifs il ya
25:14
combien de gens aujourd'hui qui pensent
25:16
que la conspiration pour un gouvernement
25:19
mondial
25:20
vieille de la juiverie sait on entend
25:24
parler de ça constamment les gens qui
25:26
disent que ce sont les juifs derrière ça
25:28
et si on se met à étudier le dossier on
25:31
voit que effectivement il ya beaucoup de
25:33
gens qui ont des non juifs qui sont
25:36
d'aider en apparence des juifs et qui
25:38
sont dans des positions clés de pouvoir
25:40
m'en tout de suite cette organisation
25:42
mondiale et cette tyrannie globale
25:47
semble avoir une identité juive a bien
25:50
aidé à bien des égards alors qu'est ce
25:52
qu'il en est mais qui est le judaïsme
25:56
peut avoir été infiltré et que ces gens
26:00
sont en apostasie c'est à dire qu'il
26:03
n'adhère pas du tout du tout à la
26:06
religion qu'il prétend représenter mais
26:08
au contraire ils s'en servent pour aller
26:12
chercher la sympathie parce que les
26:14
juifs ont réellement été persécutés mais
26:18
c'est devenu une industrie de la
26:21
victimisation et on voit la même chose
26:23
ici avec les autochtones on les
26:25
maintient dans un état d' esclavage et
26:28
de souffrances on les maintient dans la
26:31
base une situation où ils ont besoin
26:33
dead est ainsi la conscience coupable de
26:38
des gens de bonne volonté qui ne se
26:41
rendent pas compte qu'il s'agit en fait
26:43
d'une diversion d'une manipulation elles
26:45
vont contribuer on va aller chercher des
26:47
gros budget pour aider cesser ces gens
26:50
ces minorités ethniques qui sont
26:52
persécutés et où van l'argent mais elle
26:56
elle va directement dans les poches de
26:58
ceux qui sont les premiers responsables
26:59
et coupables en fait on trouvait façon
27:03
d'en profiter voyez cette mentalité
27:04
extrêmement malsaine vient de très loin
27:06
en arrière dans le canon quand des jeux
27:08
il faut remonter à trois mille ans
27:10
d'histoire à l'époque où ils étaient
27:12
captifs en esclavage
27:14
babylon et qu' il y avait ces grands ses
27:19
adulateurs de balle de moloch de cette
27:22
de se déliter
27:24
extrêmement
27:26
maléfique qui
27:28
exigeait des sacrifices humains mais qui
27:31
en fait justifié le règne de la terreur
27:34
et qui faisaient que dès cette époque
27:38
très reculés on a eu ce glissement de
27:40
plus en plus sordide vers des
27:43
agissements de plus en plus inhumain
27:46
alors de la liane études à mener sur
27:48
l'origine de cette de cette folie chez
27:52
chez certains groupes
27:54
qui ont qui ont mené vers des dérives
27:57
qui aujourd'hui culmine vers une
28:00
tentative de prise de pouvoir
28:02
de gens qui ont une mentalité
28:05
extrêmement malsaine maintenant l'heure
28:08
leurs manoeuvres sort au grand jour
28:10
parce que c'est l'apogée c'est le grand
28:14
moment de vérité pour eux lorsqu'ils
28:16
devront tenter de consolider un
28:19
gouvernement mondial sous l'égide de
28:21
l'or leurs systèmes de croyance et c'est
28:25
pour ça qu'ils sont dans une position
28:27
aussi vulnérable c'est qu'ils sortent
28:28
pour la première fois au grand jour et
28:30
là à leur grande surprise ils ont
28:32
sous-estimé
28:33
l'humanité en général et là il ya un
28:35
contrecoup qui qui est terrible
28:38
maintenant leur sort je pense est salée
28:42
mais c'est pas c'est pas de ça dont je
28:45
vous parlais moi c'est qu'est ce qu'on
28:47
va faire maintenant pour faire face à la
28:49
crise qui qui a lieu actuellement
28:53
il s'agit il s'agit d'un mouvement
28:55
d'empyr un mouvement dans pire qui
28:58
évidemment a été se servit la puissance
29:02
militaire américaine depuis longtemps
29:04
mais c'est un mouvement n'en perdent
29:06
beaucoup plus ancien que la république
29:09
des états unis d'amérique et lorsque
29:12
cette république a été fondée en
29:14
d'ailleurs et à beaucoup de francs
29:15
maçons qui ont étaient signataires de la
29:17
déclaration d'indépendance
29:20
les francs maçons ont utilisé cette même
29:24
philosophie bien qu'il se soit goût très
29:27
important dans cet organe dans cette
29:30
structure pour un nouvel ordre mondial
29:33
ils sont là un niveau inférieur
29:37
et beaucoup d'entre eux ont coopéré sans
29:41
trop savoir qui étaient les vrais
29:42
dirigeants et qui a quel était leur
29:44
véritable origine ya beaucoup de
29:46
mysticisme dans la franc maçonnerie
29:48
on va se joindre à ce mouvement sans
29:51
qu'on soit informé de ce
29:54
cd réel principe d'ailleurs tous les
29:57
degrés initiatique au départ sont là
30:00
pour leurrer on ne vous dit pas vraiment
30:03
quel est le mystère c'est de la
30:05
diversion donc ce mysticisme qui est qui
30:08
et qui est toxique qui eric et apporte
30:11
les gens par la curiosité et par
30:13
l'ambition à embrasser des organisations
30:17
devenir membre d'organisations sans
30:20
qu'il sache vraiment de quoi il s'agit
30:21
et lorsqu ils le découvrent souvent ils
30:24
ont trop à perdre et
30:27
si peu à gagner en faisant votre face
30:30
parce que comme dans n'importe quel
30:32
groupe criminalisé on en crée davantage
30:36
les membres qui sont dans le secret que
30:40
le reste la population qui demeure dans
30:43
l'ombre donc le secret devient piège ont
30:45
informé maintenant tu peux plus quittés
30:48
et donc cette ce système de hiérarchie
30:51
pyramidale est extrêmement extrêmement
30:54
dangereux parce qu'il attire des gens
30:56
vers le sommet qui dit non
30:59
qui n'ont pas de scrupules qui sont
31:01
immoraux et qui sont pas ta femme à tout
31:03
faire pour le pouvoir et là ce qui se
31:05
produit au sommet dit est absolument
31:07
infernal
31:08
donc pourquoi ont-ils signé un document
31:11
qui donne autant de liberté à l'humanité
31:15
c'est la grande expérience les gens qui
31:19
ont cette mentalité
31:20
était convaincu que cette liberté serait
31:24
mal utilisé et que ça justifierait leur
31:27
tyrannie dons qu'ils avaient signé ce
31:29
document avec l'idée de faire la
31:32
démonstration que l'humanité
31:35
ne mérite pas d'avoir de tels droits et
31:38
de telles libertés et la meilleure façon
31:41
de prouver c'est un leurre donne à ses
31:43
droits et en observant ce qu'ils vont en
31:47
faire et il a depuis cette époque là
31:50
qu'il joue avec les apparences c'est à
31:53
dire qu'il dans le secret travail à à
31:57
polluer si vous voulez le mode social et
32:02
ils ont ils ont agi de façon à combler
32:05
meurent de façon à induire la corruption
32:08
volontairement à travers toutes les
32:11
outils à leur disposition
32:13
ça inclut les médias le divertissement
32:15
le sport les les drogues illégales et
32:20
tout ce qui était possible de faire pour
32:24
affaiblir les moeurs pour corrompre les
32:28
moeurs a été mis en oeuvre un que la
32:31
désinformation a été massive hélas pour
32:34
eux c'est la conclusion que les gens ne
32:37
méritait pas
32:38
d'avoir de tels droits et c'est pour ça
32:41
que l'or maintenant ils sont justifiés
32:42
pour de détruire la république des états
32:45
unis d'amérique donc tout ça repose sur
32:48
des manoeuvres que l'on garde secrètes
32:50
et que on dévoile soi-disant de façon à
32:54
faire la preuve que le public ne pas
32:59
que les gens en général n'ont pas ce
33:01
qu'il faut pour assumer cette
33:04
responsabilité d'avoir cette liberté
33:07
mais c'est facile lorsqu'on agit
33:11
de façon furtive bien sûr ils nous ont
33:15
dévoilé plein de choses mais jamais
33:17
directement et de façon qu'on pourrait
33:20
considérer vraiment honnête alors c'est
33:23
un message que j'envoie aux militaires
33:25
là si vous maintenez cette attitude de
33:28
penser que le peuple n'est pas capable
33:31
de savoir d'ailleurs moi j'ai
33:34
ma confidente mon épouse agnès
33:38
je partage tout avec elle et il ya
33:40
beaucoup de choses qui elle m'aide à
33:43
comprendre
33:43
et là elle a une vision du monde qui est
33:46
vraiment singulière est très intéressant
33:48
venant des vieux pays d'europe elle a
33:51
aussi cette expérience à son à son
33:54
avantage et
33:56
c'est elle qui m'a fait prendre
33:57
conscience de ça
34:00
pourquoi ne pas informer les gens
34:02
maintenant tout de suite
34:04
sous prétexte qu'ils ne sont pas
34:07
capables de gérer la réalité peut-être
34:11
mais là présentement les lits sont dans
34:14
une situation si grave on ne peut
34:16
prendre de chance on doit leur donner le
34:19
bénéfice du doute et et leur dire
34:21
carrément ce qui s'est vraiment passé et
34:25
advienne que pourra mais on ne peut pas
34:27
justifier le silence à ce stage ou
34:30
d'aider des gens de bonne volonté qui
34:33
ont agi avec le plus le plus de
34:36
discernement qui ont aidé qui ont fait
34:39
preuve de bon sens qui ont manifester
34:41
paisiblement sont maintenant cibler par
34:44
un groupe de gens qui sont au pouvoir
34:47
qui sont paniqués qui sont devenus très
34:49
dangereux et limiteur risque d'être
34:52
amalgamer à tout ça et lambin c'est ça
34:56
devient inextricable
34:57
on ne verra jamais la lumière au bout du
34:59
tunnel si
35:02
l'information ne sortent pas alors moi
35:04
c'est ce qu'on me dit à travers le
35:07
réseau des patriotes américains c'est
35:08
que ça sent bien qu'ils soient sans vie
35:09
de john et à l'autre si je pose est
35:11
d'arriver maintenant
35:13
je le verrai je croirai quand je le
35:15
verrai

 

You are subscribed to email updates from The Proverbial Fix Is In.
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States