Blogger's note: with Transcript
...,,,,,
Thursday the 12th of October now I'm
really going to ask you for about 10 or
15 minutes of your time today this is
from the health and democracy conference
13th of September 2023 in the European
Parliament in
Strasburg now Philip Krauss is one of
the lawyers involved in citiz the
citizens initiative challenging the
European Parliament to reject the new
international Health regulations and the
who pandemic treaty uh is Dutch and
speak superb English so please just give
him this bit of time and what can be
seen
today in from the documents that are on
the table that are about to be
negotiated under the title of new
pandemic treaty and amendments to the
international Health
regulations we are here today because we
are all concerned by the World Health
organization's strong pressure to EXT
extend its powers its structural and its
Financial capacities with a permanent
effect over the sovereignity of the
countries and over the
self-determination of the people it was
in the wake of the coid 19 crisis that
the wh has initiated a reform process
which will bring significant changes to
all of us that will concern every human
being and every of the 194 member states
on this planet this reform process was
started in 2021 with two working streams
preparing two separate legal instruments
number one a complete new treaty the
so-called new pandemic treaty and number
two significant amendments to the
already existing International Health
regulations these two legal instruments
treaty and IH are about to be negotiated
and finalized and they are they bring
material changes the contents of these
drafts are on the table they are
available they are available for
everybody and already in 8 months time
from now in may
2024 the
194 member states of the who will have
their final vote on both of these
International
agreements this process takes place
behind closed
doors and at a tremendous speed it is
not reported nor discussed in our
newspapers in our national parliaments
in universities nor in
society it is
inacceptable this is inacceptable
because these two legal instruments
will affect every one of us by reducing
even diminishing our loss our our right
of self-determination our right in
general of human dignity and it will
eliminate the basic principle of
democratic
participation also the effects of these
Charities will be felt by member states
they will lose who will lose their
sovereignity and their autonomy autonomy
therefore every human being on this
planet should understand the essence of
the two legal instruments which come
under the title of pandemic prevention
pandemic preparedness and
response in a
nutshell the
wh claims in these two legal instruments
an absolute at
and non-question leadership in all
Health
matters as soon as wh refers itself to
pandemic prevention preparedness and
response wh claims to have the ultimate
expertise and the ultimate power in all
aspects of this wild wide
field just I recommend to read carefully
the current existing draft of the
Amendments of the international Health
regulations article 13A and article
42 it shall be granted the power of a
massive self authorization whenever it
claims to act under this purpose I
recommend to read article 12 that
establish the preconditions for Public
Health Emergency of international con
concern together with Annex two of the
proposed amendments
on the basis of an extremely wague
concept one
Health which basically means anything
and nothing animals Health ecosystem
concerns
about the level of CO2 and of course
human health can give rise to permanent
measures and even to a public health
emergency to a pandemic called out and
declared by the w
ho and thereby number four wh has the
right will have the right to not only
declare recommendations made by several
experts but also to impose on the people
of this planet or only to a certain
region all kinds of restrictions access
restrictions lockdowns surveillance and
experimental treatments so far the list
of these potential measures can be found
in the international Health regulations
article 18 and there you will also find
one example of the precondition of the
proof of vaccination that was so far
meant to be
nonbinding in the future as word binding
is eliminated and as we have explicitly
written down in article 13A the proposal
and 42 of The Proposal the commitment
that the member states will give when
they accept um these amendments the
commitment that they will have to apply
the proposed
measures this is not enough further
wh will most
notably the reserve and assume the right
to Define as the sole instance of on
this planet and to control all
information that it claims to be related
to health and this assumes as well the
right for
censorship and the right to interfere in
social
communication it seems to be so
important to the wh that these
Provisions can be found in both of the
international new agre agreements in
international Health regulations and in
the new pandemic
treaty and last but not least of a brief
summary that should any time be given
once we speak about these new changes is
the fact that there is no mechanism
foreseen that will allow the people or
the member states to challenge the
assessment of wh whether it is the who's
assessment about a public health
emergency or their assessment with
respect to certain measures or when it
comes to the imposing imposing of a
regime for what they call vaccination as
experimental as it might be there will
be simply no stop buttom for none of the
member states and not of course not for
us the citizens so now if we just look
at it as a whole this right of wh to
self declare to Auto authorize Auto
authorize itself to claim and Public
Health Emergency of international
concern and to maintain it for as long
as it wants number two to issue
so-called recommendations that will be
legally
binding and that will be subject subject
to an system of surveillance
surveillance of the people surveillance
of the member states then the total
control and Monopoly on information
including the right of censorship and
then the fact that there is no mechanism
of control the control of wh and of
Correction what do we have as a result
well it is very simple to say without
the open and the Poss the open debate
without the possibility of having
different opinions different hypothesis
different methods to be discussed on the
at the table there will be no science
and there will be ultimately no
democracy and there will be no legal
Court proceedings and no justice if the
result is already predefined by one one
sole Authority on this planet there
cannot be by definition an proper
scientific process a proper
decision-making process there cannot be
any democracy number two it is a basic
principle not only of international law
not only of national constitutional law
that we have as human beings the right
to know what we consent
to so if we ask
ourselves have we been asked have you
been informed about this process that is
about to become reality the answer is
no and there is one important
distinction to be made between these two
legal instruments the new pandemic
treaty will be considered by wh itself
as a treaty and thereby shall will be
subject to an National process of debate
and um
ratification but not so for the
international Health regulations the
international Health regulations by
definition of wh's own uh writing when
you read the international Health
regulations they are qualified as health
regulations according to the wh
Constitution Article 21 and what does
that mean as a consequence there will be
an automatic coming into
Force right after the vote in
2024 so far it is still 24 months but
these 24 months have been reduced to 12
months only so that means that at the
end after May
2025 the international Health
regulations will become law
automatically
so we will not be asked we have not been
informed and there will be a process of
automatic enactment of the international
Health regulation this is about as
severe as it can be when it comes to the
violation of the principle of an
informed consent this principle does not
exist only on the individual level but
it exists only also for democracies as a
whole and
it is it exists under the title of
selfdetermination of the people which is
one of the founding principles of the
United Nations in the United Nations
Charter Article 1 of
1946 now this is the reason why we
should all get to know not only what is
in these documents but we shall claim
and clearly say that some of these um
International na Health regulations and
the changes that are modified and
declared there will totally be opposed
to what we consider our constitutional
order as there is no public information
right as there will be censorship as
there will be human rights not protected
as there will be no checks and balances
as actually it will be the who to
determine under which legal stat we will
have to live that means the power will
not be anymore in the hands of the
people and therefore these negotiations
have to be stopped immediately and it is
an matter and a duty for all citizens
now to impose the pressure towards their
public Representatives political
representatives to make sure that the
politicians the political representative
atives understand that they go on be
right on Beyond of their entrusted vote
they can use now as this is just an
overview and as we are here in Europe
and as within
Europe the these rules have been already
pushed forward to an alarming extent we
found it important to provide you an
more detailed overview on the situation
here in
Europe well if you've got concerns about
a
dystopian dictatorial future uh maybe
that helped to bring them into focus a
little bit let me just give you a couple
of examples of what they're talking
about I mean these are the Articles here
I'll put the links of course they're
talking about here Health
Products vaccines medical devices
personal protective equipment
Diagnostics assistive products I'm not
quite sure what that is cell and Gene
based therapists and their components
materials or parts now I don't want uh
these imposed on me through the power of
my nation state sell and gene-based
therapists Health Products including
vaccines medical
devices it it really sounds really quite
terrifying that the who would have total
power over imposing these honors and if
we look through other parts of the
treaty we can see here that this is what
they've done quite often here all
they've done is simply cross out
nonbinding so instead of used to mean
non-binding advice now it means binding
advice and and we just look look through
it um so for example here they've
crossed out this part with full respect
for the dignity human rights and
fundamental freedoms of persons why on
Earth would you have a wh treaty where
you take out a clause that says the
Implement implementation of these
regulations shall be with the full
respect for the dignity human rights uh
human rights and fundamental freedoms of
persons why would you cross that out get
on to your politicians and tell them to
kick this
into out of the stadium we I don't want
it if you want it do nothing if if you
don't if you don't want it contact your
politicians and they can stop this but
we're running out of time at the moment
the UK government the Dutch government
the Australian government the American
government the Canadian government the
NZ government as far as I know this is
just going to be rubber
stamped why are our politicians not
standing up for our
freedoms and our nation sovereignty
quite incredible but this is what's
happening um if you think I've
misinterpreted this then just read this
for yourself and let me know how I've
misinterpreted um but it's this is the I
must say the way I read it is very
consistent with Philip K's way of
reading it but anyway he's probably put
itth much better than I could so I'm
going to leave it there um time is
running out so may may next year so that
I mean it's already October November
December it's only seven or eight months
away and the politicians don't seem to
even have this on their
radar and of course needless to say
mainstream media is not giving it the
attention that you might uh
think it
merits leave it there Philip Cur has
said it all thank you for
No comments:
Post a Comment