"STAY ALERT: They Are Planning Complete FINANCIAL LOCKDOWN" - Whitney We...

0,,

us intelligence or really any

0:01

intelligence agency today can frame

0:03

anyone they want for a Cyber attack we

0:05

know this from one of the last Wikileaks

0:08

releases called Vault 7 where uh it

0:11

revealed that among the cia's hacking

0:13

tools were the ability to place the

0:14

Fingerprints of adversary States or

0:16

really any group they wanted into hacks

0:19

that were actually conducted by the CIA

0:21

itself basically a tool to create cyber

0:24

false flags for any

0:27

purpose and the current CIA director is

0:30

the person that was in charge of the

0:31

Carnegie endowment when they ran or when

0:34

they created these papers with the

0:36

biggest private Banks and central banks

0:37

in the world about a a Cyber attack on

0:39

the financial system and how that would

0:42

push for a merging of data sharing

0:44

between Banks and the CIA and

0:47

intelligence the future isn't just on

0:49

the horizon it's already here and it's

0:51

far more unsettling than you might think

0:54

the essential pieces for a radical

0:55

overhaul of the Global Financial system

0:58

stable coins tokenized deposits and

1:00

public private Partnerships are quietly

1:02

being set into place but what's missing

1:06

a trigger in a revealing conversation

1:08

with James Patrick investigative

1:10

journalist Whitney Webb warns of a

1:12

looming threat which is the Central Bank

1:14

digital currencies

1:16

cbdcs once they're fully implemented the

1:19

idea of financial privacy may become a

1:21

thing of the past tied to digital IDs

1:24

these currencies would allow governments

1:26

and corporations to monitor every

1:28

transaction tracking your every move

1:31

under the guise of protecting against

1:33

money laundering or fighting terrorism

1:36

these systems could enable unprecedented

1:38

levels of State surveillance over the

1:40

financial activities of ordinary

1:42

citizens what's worse cbdcs won't

1:45

replace the traditional banking Powers

1:47

they'll strengthen them institutions

1:50

like JP Morgan and City Group are

1:52

already making strategic moves with

1:54

stable coins and tokenized deposits

1:56

positioning themselves at the Forefront

1:58

of this new reality in short the future

2:01

of Finance is closer than you think and

2:03

it's designed to benefit the powerful

2:05

while placing your freedom at risk for

2:08

further insights into Whitney web's

2:10

conversation with James Patrick be sure

2:12

to watch clips from the interview please

2:15

like this video subscribe to the channel

2:17

and turn on post notifications for more

2:19

content enjoy the video it's quite clear

2:22

that the way to force onboarding of a

2:24

cbdc is going to be some sort of Crisis

2:27

some sort of event where people uh will

2:30

be made an offer they can't refuse

2:33

essentially whatever that crisis is that

2:36

creates the situation where people will

2:38

have you know very little choice but to

2:40

onboard to this new digital currency

2:42

system uh it could manifest in a number

2:45

of ways but regardless of how it

2:47

manifests what the narrative is going to

2:49

be is that privacy is dangerous

2:52

anonymity is dangerous specifically

2:54

Financial privacy is dangerous those are

2:57

going to be the narratives that come out

2:58

of this event and and that's going to be

3:00

a way to force onboarding both onto

3:02

digital currency that can be tracked to

3:04

stop Terror financing or or things of

3:07

that nature and also we have to know who

3:10

everybody online is or we have to know

3:12

who everybody is interacting with these

3:14

systems we need digital ID well there's

3:16

a couple reason why I think they'd want

3:17

to have private banks have like a major

3:18

role in this digital currency system to

3:21

come if there's a private sector in in

3:23

entity banking you and managing your

3:26

money it's much easier for them to bank

3:28

you than the federal government so for

3:30

example if the Federal Reserve were to

3:32

do a direct issue cbdc it would be

3:34

harder for them to freeze someone's bank

3:37

account uh or debank them in any sort of

3:40

significant way as opposed to a private

3:42

company where you have uh for example uh

3:45

precedents where JP Morgan Chase for

3:48

example debanked uh Dr marola and some

3:51

of his Executives and didn't give any

3:53

reason as to why they just said we can

3:55

no longer uh provide you with financial

3:58

services no questions that would be very

4:00

hard to do in the case of a direct

4:02

issued cbdc this is something similar to

4:04

the argument that's been made for social

4:06

media companies censoring they say oh

4:08

but they're private companies so they

4:11

can restrict speech however they want

4:13

but we know now that their restrictions

4:15

on private speech have been a result of

4:18

public sector pressure right so again

4:21

people need to keep in mind that this is

4:23

a public private partnership that's the

4:25

prevailing model in the United States

4:26

the digital Dollar in the United States

4:28

is also going to be a public private

4:30

model you'll have the fed the Central

4:32

Bank working with the private banks that

4:35

own the FED in the United States and

4:38

that will be the the partnership between

4:40

them will be the system it's not going

4:42

to be all public it's not going to be

4:43

all private it is a partnership If the

4:46

Fed were to do a direct issued cbdc it

4:48

would take them a few years to design um

4:51

experiment and deploy it if you're using

4:53

these existing dollar pig stable coins

4:55

those are already here they're already

4:57

on blockchains um and a of those phases

5:01

that would take the fit a few years have

5:02

already been accomplished if you choose

5:04

to use those and if you regulate them so

5:06

that they have to for example keep their

5:08

Reserves at the fed you know then you're

5:11

able to sort of have the same kind of

5:14

system uh but you don't have to go

5:16

through um the process of creating a

5:19

direct issued cbdc so one of the biggest

5:22

developers right now of cbdcs is this

5:24

company called R3 that's backed by some

5:26

of the biggest Wall Street banks in the

5:27

world um and they were named by banking

5:30

magazine as the cbdc partner of the year

5:32

last year and they're developing a

5:34

Litany of cbdcs for countries all around

5:37

the world but that's just one part of

5:39

what they do they have this thing they

5:40

call a digital currency accelerator and

5:43

the three types of digital currencies

5:44

are three develops are cbdcs staple

5:48

coins and tokenized deposits or dep

5:51

deposit tokens and some banks in the US

5:53

have already rolled out deposit tokens

5:55

City Group JP Morgan uh JP Morgan

5:59

actually had a research paper out last

6:00

year about how um cbdcs are inferior to

6:05

deposit tokens and how deposit tokens

6:06

are better so Oliver Gail who defines

6:09

himself as the founder of

6:11

cbdcs um has more recently co-founded a

6:14

company called fluent Finance what

6:16

fluent finances is is you know they

6:18

attempt to create a trustworthy dollar

6:20

Peg stable coin that they call us plus

6:23

and it's sort of framed as an answer to

6:25

dollar pig stable coins like tether that

6:27

have been controversial for having

6:28

opaque Reserves

6:30

so the whole thing about us plus is

6:31

having trackable reserves and real time

6:34

and and all of this and so it's an

6:36

attempt to create a very extremely

6:39

trustworthy and and backed by a

6:41

Consortium of banks a bank Le US dollar

6:44

P stable coin so if the inventor of

6:47

cbdcs is moving into stable coins he

6:50

probably knows that there's something

6:51

there according to Whitney web stable

6:54

coins and tokenized deposits are merely

6:56

a bridge to a darker future where

6:58

central bank digital currencies cbdcs

7:02

dominate by keeping Banks involved

7:05

governments can avoid the backlash of

7:07

fully nationalizing money while still

7:09

tightening their grip this mirrors how

7:11

crises have been handled in the past

7:14

centralizing power under the guise of

7:16

Market competition web foresees an

7:19

inevitable cyber crisis whether real or

7:22

manufactured as the trigger for this

7:24

shift central banks alongside the

7:27

financial Giants will present cbdc sees

7:30

as the solution to the chaos but there's

7:33

more at play the roll out of digital IDs

7:36

will tie your financial and digital life

7:38

into one vast surveillance Network

7:40

leaving privacy in the past what's

7:43

promised as Financial inclusion will

7:46

likely only consolidate control in the

7:48

hands of a few in the end it's not about

7:51

empowerment it's about stripping away

7:53

rights privacy and the ability to choose

7:56

how your life is governed let's go back

7:58

to the interview and watch more Clips to

8:00

gain insights from Whitney

8:02

web well if you look at all of this

8:04

through the lens of risk

8:06

management from the elites perspective

8:09

let's take the words of Larry thinkink

8:10

for example of Black Rock who's been

8:12

obsessed with risk management his whole

8:14

career he has a quote he's on video

8:18

saying um that he that the markets do

8:21

not like democracy democracy is messy

8:24

they like totalitarian governments

8:26

because the risk is low Elon Musk is the

8:29

one of these figures that's trying to

8:31

sort of position himself as a a free

8:33

speech champion and one of these figures

8:36

uh that's on the populist right but in

8:39

reality a lot of the policies that Elon

8:40

Musk promotes like carbon taxes for

8:43

example um have traditionally been uh

8:46

policies promoted like the world

8:47

economic forum and entities like this

8:49

that are seen as being uh globalist and

8:52

not populist in nature uh people forget

8:54

that Elon Musk is someone who whose

8:57

business has depended to a large degree

8:59

ree on government subsidies and

9:01

currently a lot of his companies either

9:02

depend on mass adoption of electric

9:05

vehicles via uh policies linked to the

9:08

sustainable development goals to phase

9:10

out fossil fuel vehicles um or they um

9:14

are contractors for the Pentagon and

9:16

intelligence like SpaceX I think there's

9:19

essentially a consensus that some other

9:21

some other very significant financial

9:23

crisis is in the cards for the next

9:24

several years and if you are the big

9:27

Banks and you know that's going to

9:29

happen happen you probably want to avoid

9:31

a scenario like what happened in 2008

9:34

where the public knew that you were the

9:35

source of the malfant and the economic

9:38

problems which of course spond movements

9:40

like Occupy Wall Street if you want to

9:42

avoid that how what is the best way to

9:45

absolve yourself of any sort of blame

9:47

for mismanaging or losing people's money

9:50

if you can say that hackers took it then

9:54

you're totally absolved in whoever the

9:56

hackers are the ones to blame and um

10:00

us intelligence or really any

10:01

intelligence agency today can frame

10:03

anyone they want for a Cyber attack we

10:05

know this from one of the last Wikileaks

10:08

releases called Vault 7 where uh it

10:11

revealed that among the cia's hacking

10:13

tools were the ability to place the

10:14

Fingerprints of adversary States or

10:16

really any group they wanted into hacks

10:19

that were actually conducted by the CIA

10:21

itself basically a tool to create cyber

10:24

false flags for any

10:27

purpose and the current CIA director is

10:30

the person that was in charge of the

10:31

Carnegie endowment when they ran or when

10:34

they created these papers with the

10:36

biggest private Banks and central banks

10:37

in the world about a a Cyber attack on

10:39

the financial system and how that would

10:42

push for a merging of data sharing

10:44

between Banks and the CIA and

10:46

intelligence so I think one of the

10:48

reasons they want this new system that

10:50

ultimately amounts to a control system

10:52

is because they see it as the ultimate

10:53

form of risk management so you surveil

10:56

them constantly uh you can turn their

10:58

money on an off you can turn their

11:01

access to services and really anything

11:02

else on and off as well under the

11:04

digital ID functionality um it's uh a

11:08

way to keep people in line in a way that

11:11

didn't exist in you know feudal Europe

11:13

and under that model but they're clearly

11:14

moving uh to that model and it's

11:16

interesting because the UN essentially

11:18

admits that they talk about the

11:19

acceleration of the adoption of all

11:21

these um of all this digital

11:23

infrastructure is exacerbating the

11:25

wealth Gap and making the billionaires

11:27

even more wealthy but the billionaires

11:29

and the bankers are the people that are

11:30

designing all these un policies you know

11:33

people um you know like Mark Carney Mike

11:35

Bloomberg Bill Gates um all of these

11:38

guys are the ones influencing these

11:40

policies more than anyone they admit

11:41

that they're exacerbating the wealth Gap

11:43

but we're full steam ahead on on these

11:45

policies anyway so I mean they're

11:47

obviously going to keep exacerbating it

11:49

and a lot of those guys that are

11:50

designing and maintaining the technology

11:52

are deciding what it does are going to

11:54

be in a very different class than the

11:55

rest of us who are you know having this

11:58

this system imposed upon us we're not

12:00

the ones designing it we don't have a a

12:02

stake in the stakeholder capitalism

12:04

model as Bitcoin nears a bullish

12:06

engulfing pattern for the first time in

12:08

18 months there's growing optimism for

12:11

its long-term Outlook yet this rise also

12:14

signals potential volatility ahead

12:16

echoing Whitney web's concerns about the

12:18

future of Finance with bitcoin's open

12:21

interest surging to $35 billion it's

12:24

clear that the Futures Market is playing

12:27

a significant role however despite this

12:30

surge flat funding rates suggest that

12:32

Perpetual Traders are still hesitant web

12:35

warns that while bitcoin's rise reflects

12:37

market dynamics it also foreshadows a

12:40

larger shift one that could lead to

12:42

financial systems controlled by a few

12:44

powerful players the combination of

12:47

Central Bank digital currencies cbdcs

12:50

and digital IDs threatens to erod

12:53

privacy setting up a future where

12:55

surveillance and centralized control

12:57

reign supreme as institutions tighten

13:00

their hold on digital assets bitcoin's

13:02

current market movements might just be

13:04

the beginning of a transformation that

13:06

sees Financial freedoms diminished with

13:09

technical indicators hinting at

13:11

short-term Corrections and spot Traders

13:13

aggressively selling into resistance the

13:15

future of decentralized Finance remains

13:18

uncertain dominated by forces far beyond

13:21

mere Market Cycles the question now

13:23

isn't whether Bitcoin will continue to

13:25

rise but what kind of world will be

13:28

built in its wake

13:30

as we wrap up what do you think about

13:32

Central Bank digital currencies will

13:35

they Safeguard Financial privacy or are

13:37

they a gateway to Greater control let us

13:40

know your thoughts in the comments below

13:43

if you found this video

13:44

thought-provoking be sure to share it

13:46

give us a thumbs up and hit that

13:48

subscribe button to stay tuned for more

13:50

insights thanks for

13:58

watching for